Skip to content
Checked 2026-10-03 · 104 problems

Status of famous open problems

Where each problem stands, in one line: what is proved, the best bounds, and the latest change. Every problem page has the full statement, the history of the bounds and primary sources. We re-check the list against the literature and correct it when something moves — tell us if we missed a result.

Mathematics

ProblemWhere it standsLatest change
Bounds on the de Bruijn–Newman constant Λ
Analysis
Open. 0 ≤ Λ ≤ 0.2 is published (Rodgers–Tao 2020; Platt–Trudgian 2021); unrefereed 2026 computer-assisted claims go below 0.18.2026: Λ ≤ 0.1787854 (unrefereed)
Gomila, with Romik and Atkin
The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture
Number theory
Open (Clay Millennium Problem). The rank part is known for analytic rank 0 and 1 (Gross–Zagier, Kolyvagin) and for a positive proportion of curves; no case of analytic rank ≥ 2 is proven.—
The Hodge conjecture
Geometry
Open (Clay Millennium Problem). The main recent progress is Markman's 2025 proof for abelian fourfolds; no general proof or disproof exists.—
The Riemann Hypothesis
Number theory
Open (Clay Millennium Problem). Verified for zeros up to height 3·10^12; the best claimed proportion of zeros simple and on the critical line is more than 2/3 (August 2026, Anthropic/Claude, independent proof by Lamzouri), not yet refereed.2026: > 2/3, simple and on the line (unrefereed)
Anthropic research model; Lamzouri
Computer-assisted proofs of finite-time singularities in 3D Euler
Analysis
Open (claims under review). Chen–Hou proved blowup for 3D axisymmetric Euler with a boundary; September 2026 claims of blowup on R³ (OpenAI; Alpöge–Buckmaster, with forcing) are not yet peer reviewed.—
Crossing numbers of complete and complete bipartite graphs
Graph theory
Open. Hill's conjecture is proven for n ≤ 14 (cr(K₁₃) = 225, cr(K₁₄) = 315; Aichholzer et al. 2021); Zarankiewicz's conjecture is proven for min(m,n) ≤ 6 and some m = 7, 8 cases, and cr(K_{n,n}) ≥ 0.9118·Z(n,n) asymptotically.2021: cr(K₁₃) = 225, cr(K₁₄) = 315
Aichholzer et al.
Do odd perfect numbers exist?
Number theory
Open. An odd perfect number would exceed 10^1500, have at least 101 prime factors (Ochem–Rao 2012) and at least 10 distinct ones (Nielsen 2015).2015: ω(N) ≥ 10
Nielsen
Frankl's union-closed sets conjecture
Combinatorics
Open. The best refereed constant is about 0.38271 (Liu 2023); a 2026 preprint claims about 0.38289, far from the conjectured 1/2.2026: ≈ 0.38289 (preprint)
Costa & Sadhu
Legendre's conjecture
Number theory
Open. Verified computationally to about 4·10^18; a prime between consecutive cubes is known for n > exp(exp(32.76)) (Mossinghoff–Trudgian–Yang 2024).2024: cubes: n ≥ exp(exp(32.76))
Mossinghoff, Trudgian, Yang
The (binary) Goldbach conjecture
Number theory
Open. Verified for all even n ≤ 4·10^18 (Oliveira e Silva, Herzog, Pardi 2014); the ternary version was proved by Helfgott (2013).2014: verified for even n ≤ 4·10^18
Oliveira e Silva, Herzog, Pardi
The 1/3–2/3 conjecture for balanced pairs in posets
Combinatorics
Open. The best published general bound is (5−√5)/10 ≈ 0.2764 (Brightwell–Felsner–Trotter 1995); a 2026 preprint claims a tiny improvement, and all posets with up to 14 elements have been verified.2026: verified for all posets with ≤ 14 elements (preprint)
A. Gupta
The chromatic number of the plane (Hadwiger–Nelson problem)
Combinatorics
Open. 5 ≤ χ(ℝ²) ≤ 7; the smallest known 5-chromatic unit-distance graph has 509 vertices (Parts 2020), and no 6-chromatic one is known.2020: 509 vertices
Parts (Polymath16)
The Collatz (3n + 1) conjecture
Number theory
Open. Convergence is verified for all n < 2^71 (Barina 2025), and Tao (2019) showed that almost all orbits attain almost bounded values.2025: verified for all n < 2^71
D. Barina
The Erdős unit distance problem in the plane
Geometry
Open (the exponent). Erdős's conjecture u(n) = n^{1+o(1)} was disproved in May 2026 (an OpenAI model; human-verified exposition arXiv 2605.20695); the exponent lies between 1.014 (Sawin) and 4/3 (Spencer–Szemerédi–Trotter).2026: α > 1 (conjecture disproved)
OpenAI model; Alon, Bloom, Gowers et al.
The Erdős–Rado sunflower conjecture
Combinatorics
Open for every k ≥ 3. The best bound is (Ck log n)^n (Alweiss–Lovett–Wu–Zhang 2019 and refinements); a 2026 preprint proves the conjecture for families of bounded VC-dimension.—
The Erdős–Straus conjecture
Number theory
Open. Verified for all n ≤ 10^18 (Mihnea & Dumitru 2025); all n outside finitely many residue classes are covered by explicit identities.2025: verified for n ≤ 10^18
Mihnea & Dumitru
The Erdős–Szekeres happy ending problem
Combinatorics
Open. ES(n) is known only up to ES(6) = 17 (Szekeres–Peters 2006); ES(7) = 33 is unproven, and ES(n) = 2^{n+o(n)} (Suk 2017).2017: ES(n) = 2^{n+o(n)}
Suk
The graceful tree conjecture (Ringel–Kotzig)
Graph theory
Open. Verified by computer for all trees with up to 35 vertices (Fang 2010); Ringel's weaker packing conjecture was proved for large n in 2020.2010: ≤ 35 vertices
Fang
The graph reconstruction conjecture
Graph theory
Open. Verified by computer for all graphs with up to 13 vertices (McKay); trees, regular and disconnected graphs, among other classes, are reconstructible.—
The invariant subspace problem for Hilbert spaces
Analysis
Open for separable Hilbert spaces; Enflo's 2023 preprint has not been accepted.—
The inverse Galois problem over Q
Algebra
Open in general. M23 was realised over Q in August 2026 (Huang, Jackson, Lee, Poonen, Pries, Zhang), so all 26 sporadic groups are now realised.—
The Jacobian conjecture in two variables
Algebra
Open for n = 2. A degree-7 counterexample C³ → C³ (Alpöge, July 2026, found with a Claude model) disproved the conjecture for all n ≥ 3.—
The Kakeya conjecture in dimensions n ≥ 4
Analysis
Open for n ≥ 4. Wang and Zahl proved the case of R³ in 2025.2025: Kakeya sets in R³ have dimension 3
Wang & Zahl
The kissing number in dimension 5
Geometry
Open. 40 ≤ τ₅ ≤ 44 (lower bound from the D5 lattice; upper bound Mittelmann–Vallentin 2010).2010: τ₅ ≤ 44
Mittelmann & Vallentin
The lonely runner conjecture
Combinatorics
Open. Proved for up to 13 runners (computer-assisted, 2025–2026); a September 2026 preprint claims 14 and 15 runners and has not yet been independently checked.2026: 11–13 runners
Sungkawichai & Trakulthongchai
The perfect cuboid problem
Number theory
Open. Computer searches show any perfect cuboid would need an odd edge above 2.5·10^13 and a space diagonal above 9·10^15.—
The twin prime conjecture and bounded prime gaps
Number theory
Open. The refereed record is H₁ ≤ 246 (Polymath 8b, 2014); unrefereed 2026 claims reach 240, 212 and 186.2026: H₁ ≤ 240 (preprint)
J. Stadlmann
Cap sets in dimension 7
Combinatorics
Open. 236 ≤ r₃(7) ≤ 291 (lower bound: Edel's construction; a 2022 preprint claims ≤ 288). Exact values are known only for n ≤ 6.—
Cap sets in dimension 8
Combinatorics
Open. The best known cap in F₃⁸ has 512 points (FunSearch, Romera-Paredes et al., Nature 2023/24); no larger construction has been reported since.2023: r₃(8) ≥ 512
Romera-Paredes et al. (FunSearch)
Costas arrays of order 32 and 33
Combinatorics
Open. Costas arrays are fully enumerated only up to order 29, and no Costas array of order 32 or 33 is known.2012: complete enumeration to order 29
Drakakis, Rickard et al.
Erdős minimum overlap problem
Combinatorics
Open. 0.379005 ≤ lim M(n)/n ≤ 0.380868 (lower: White 2022; upper: SimpleTES 2026, after AlphaEvolve's 0.380924 in 2025).2026: M ≤ 0.380868
SimpleTES
Formalised Erdős problems (Lean 4)
Number theory
Ongoing. Many erdosproblems.com problems are stated in Lean in Formal Conjectures; most remain open, and a growing number have been settled recently, often with AI assistance.—
Hadamard matrices of open orders
Combinatorics
The Hadamard conjecture is open. Matrices for all 12 previously open orders below 2000 (668, 716, …, 1964) were announced on 12 August 2026 (Alpöge, Voinov, Reynolds-Haertle, with Claude), in encoded form and without a paper yet; the smallest open order is now above 2000.2026: all 12 open orders below 2000 constructed (announced)
Alpöge, Voinov, Reynolds-Haertle, with Claude
Kissing configurations in dimensions 10–31
Geometry
Open. 2025–2026 brought new lower bounds in several dimensions (e.g. τ₁₁ ≥ 604, τ₁₂ ≥ 841, τ₁₉ ≥ 11,948); a September 2026 preprint claims small further gains in dimensions 25–31.2026: τ₁₉ ≥ 11,948
B. S. Ho
Large cap sets in F_3^n
Combinatorics
Open. Exact maxima are known for n ≤ 6; the asymptotic capacity lies between 2.2203 (Zhai et al. 2025) and 2.756 (Ellenberg–Gijswijt 2016).2025: capacity ≥ 2.2203
Zhai et al. (X-evolve)
Lean formalisation of Busy Beaver deciders and results
Logic & formalisation
Partly done. BB(5) = 47,176,870 and BB(2,4) = 3,932,964 are proved in Coq/Rocq; a community Lean 4 port claims BB(5) using native_decide, while a proof checked by the Lean kernel alone is still missing.—
Optimal Golomb rulers
Combinatorics
Open. Optimal rulers are proven for up to 28 marks (OGR-28, length 585, distributed.net 2022); no optimality search for 29 marks is running.2022: OGR-28 optimal (585)
distributed.net
Small van der Waerden numbers
Combinatorics
Open. Only seven non-trivial values are known, the latest W(3,4) = 293 (Kouril 2012).2012: W(3,4) = 293
Kouril
Smaller covering designs
Combinatorics
Open (records table). Best known upper bounds on C(v,k,t) are maintained by the La Jolla Covering Repository.—
Snake-in-the-box — longest induced paths in hypercubes
Combinatorics
Open. Optimal snakes are known only for n ≤ 8; the best known lengths for n = 9–13 are 191, 379, 746, 1476 and 2924 (Orland et al., 2026 preprint).2026: n = 9–13: 191, 379, 746, 1476, 2924
Orland, Fagan et al.
The degree–diameter problem for graphs
Graph theory
Open. Only a few n(d,k) are known exactly, the existence of a degree-57 Moore graph is unresolved, and new record graphs keep appearing (e.g. 2026 preprints for diameter 3 and 5).—
The Ramsey number R(4,6)
Graph theory
Open. 36 ≤ R(4,6) ≤ 40 (lower bound: Exoo 2012; upper bound: Angeltveit–McKay, listed in Radziszowski's survey).2024: R(4,6) ≤ 40
Angeltveit & McKay
The Ramsey number R(5,5)
Graph theory
Open. 43 ≤ R(5,5) ≤ 46 (lower bound: Exoo 1989; upper bound: Angeltveit–McKay, arXiv 2024, J. Graph Theory 2026).2024: R(5,5) ≤ 46
Angeltveit & McKay
The sixth Schur number S(6)
Combinatorics
Open. S(6) ≥ 536 (Fredricksen–Sweet 2000), unchanged since; S(5) = 160 was settled by SAT in 2017.2017: S(5) = 160 (SAT proof)
Heule

Computer science

ProblemWhere it standsLatest change
Explicit Boolean circuit lower bounds
Complexity
Open. The best lower bound for general circuits computing an explicit function is 3.1n − o(n) (Li & Yang 2022); no superlinear bound is known.2022: 3.1n − o(n)
Li & Yang
P versus NP
Complexity
Open (Clay Millennium Problem). No accepted proof either way; any proof must get past the relativization, natural-proofs and algebrization barriers.—
Approximation ratio and integrality gap for metric TSP
Algorithms
Open. The best approximation ratio is 3/2 − ε with ε ≈ 10⁻³⁶ (Karlin–Klein–Oveis Gharan); the subtour LP gap is at most 4/3 for all instances with up to 15 vertices (Cook–Hougardy–Petrich 2026).2026: gap ≤ 4/3 verified for n ≤ 15
Cook, Hougardy, Petrich
Explicit rigid matrices (Valiant's rigidity problem)
Complexity
Open. No explicit matrices reach Valiant's rigidity parameters; constructions with an NP oracle give only sub-polynomial rank.—
The Černý conjecture on synchronizing automata
Computability
Open. The best general upper bound on the reset threshold is about 0.1654·n³ (Shitov 2019), against the conjectured (n−1)².2019: ≈ 0.1654·n³
Shitov
The exponent ω of matrix multiplication
Algorithms
Open. The best published bound is ω < 2.371339 (Alman et al. 2024); an August 2026 preprint claims ω < 2.371177.2026: ω < 2.371177 (preprint)
Dupont et al.
The log-rank conjecture in communication complexity
Complexity
Open. The best upper bound is O(√rank) (Sudakov–Tomon 2023); the largest known separation is Ω̃(log² rank) (Göös–Pitassi–Watson 2015).2023: D ≤ O(√r)
Sudakov & Tomon
The Unique Games Conjecture
Complexity
Open. The 2-to-2 Games Conjecture was proven (Khot–Minzer–Safra 2018), but the full Unique Games Conjecture remains open.—
A theory of neural scaling laws
Machine learning
Open. Empirical power laws are well documented and solvable models explain some features, but no theory predicts the exponents for realistic architectures and data.—
Deciding hard small Turing machines (Busy Beaver)
Computability
Open. BB(5) = 47,176,870 was proved in Rocq (2024). BB(6) is unknown: Σ(6) > 10↑↑10↑↑10↑↑8 (mxdys, June 2025), and about 815 six-state machines were still undecided in late September 2026, including Collatz-like cryptids such as Antihydra.2025: Σ(6) > 10↑↑10↑↑10↑↑8
mxdys
Mechanisms of grokking (delayed generalisation)
Machine learning
Open. Several partial mechanistic accounts exist (Fourier circuits, weight norm, circuit efficiency, lazy-to-rich dynamics); none predicts when grokking happens in general.—
Packing equal circles in a unit square
Optimisation
Open. Optimal packings are proven for n ≤ 33 (n = 31–33 by Markót 2021) and n = 36; best known packings are tabulated up to n = 10,000 on Packomania.2021: optimality proven for n = 31, 32, 33
M. C. Markót
Proof-producing SAT solving of open combinatorial instances
Algorithms
Open-ended. SAT with verified proofs has settled Pythagorean triples, Schur number five, Keller dimension 7 and the empty hexagon number; S(6) and small Ramsey or van der Waerden values remain open.—
Smallest sorting networks for 13+ inputs
Algorithms
Open for n ≥ 13. Minimum sizes are proven for n ≤ 12; the best known sizes for n = 13–16 are 45, 51, 56 and 60 comparators.2020: n = 11: 35 and n = 12: 39 proven optimal
Harder
Tensor rank of 3×3 matrix multiplication
Algorithms
Open. The rank is at most 23 (Laderman 1976) over every field; lower bounds are 19 in general (Bläser 2003) and 21 over F₂ (2026 preprints).2026: rank ≥ 20 over F₂
C. Wang
Tensor rank of 4×4 matrix multiplication
Algorithms
Open. The best ranks are 47 over GF(2) (AlphaTensor 2022) and 48 in characteristic ≠ 2 (AlphaEvolve 2025 over C; Dumas–Pernet–Sedoglavic over Q).2025: 48 over Q
Dumas, Pernet, Sedoglavic
The Thomson problem (minimum-energy charges on a sphere)
Optimisation
Open in general. Global minimisers are proven for n = 2–6 and 12, and in 2026 for n = 8 (Lean-verified preprint) and n = 7 (numerical global optimisation, plus an unreviewed Lean proof).2026: n = 7, numerically certified
Kuznetsov & Sahinidis

Physics & astronomy

ProblemWhere it standsLatest change
Yang–Mills existence and mass gap
Theoretical physics
Open (Clay Millennium Problem). No construction of a non-trivial 4D quantum Yang–Mills theory with a mass gap exists.—
Existence of SIC-POVMs (Zauner's conjecture)
Quantum information
Open. SICs are known numerically in all dimensions up to 151 and in some larger ones, and exactly in a few dozen; a construction for all dimensions via Stark units is conditional on unproven conjectures.—
Ground-state phase diagram of the doped 2D Hubbard model
Physics
Open. Controlled numerics find no superconductivity in the pure t′ = 0 model near optimal doping, but find d-wave superconductivity with t′ included; the full phase diagram is unsettled.—
Hadronic vacuum polarisation in the muon g−2
Physics
Open. The 2025 Theory Initiative prediction, based on lattice QCD for the leading hadronic term, agrees with experiment; the conflict between lattice and e⁺e⁻ data-driven values is unexplained.—
Mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates
Theoretical physics
Open. There is no consensus on the cuprate pairing mechanism; the ambient-pressure Tc record is 151 K in pressure-quenched Hg-1223 (PNAS 2026).—
Mutually unbiased bases in dimension 6
Quantum information
Open. Only three mutually unbiased bases are known in dimension 6; numerical evidence suggests a complete set of seven does not exist.—
Small-scale problems of cold dark matter
Astrophysics & cosmology
Open. Baryonic feedback, self-interacting dark matter and observational systematics all remain viable, partial explanations of the cusp–core, too-big-to-fail and diversity problems.—
The cosmological lithium problem
Astrophysics & cosmology
Open. Big Bang nucleosynthesis with CMB parameters predicts 7Li/H ≈ 5×10⁻¹⁰, about three times the observed Spite plateau; proposed resolutions are not confirmed.—
The Hubble tension
Astrophysics & cosmology
Open. Distance-ladder values of about 73 km/s/Mpc disagree with 67.4 ± 0.5 from Planck under ΛCDM; the TRGB calibration (about 70) keeps the ladder itself disputed.—
The solar coronal heating problem
Astrophysics & cosmology
Open. Waves, turbulence and nanoflare reconnection are all observed, but no mechanism has been shown to supply the full coronal energy budget.—
The strong CP problem
Theoretical physics
Open. The neutron EDM bound implies θ̄ ≲ 10⁻¹⁰; the axion and other solutions remain unconfirmed.—
Theory of the glass transition
Physics
Open. Swap Monte Carlo now equilibrates model liquids down to and below the experimental glass transition, but whether an ideal glass transition exists is unresolved.—
Classical simulation of random circuit sampling experiments
Quantum information
Open. The 2019 Sycamore circuits have been sampled classically (Pan–Chen–Zhang 2022); for the newest experiments no classical spoof at matching fidelity is known.—
Periodic orbits of the Newtonian three-body problem
Physics
Open-ended. The largest catalogue lists over 10,000 three-dimensional periodic orbits (Li & Liao 2025), on top of thousands of planar families.—
Precision critical exponents of the 3D Ising universality class
Theoretical physics
Open. The most precise values come from the conformal bootstrap: Δσ = 0.518148806(24), Δε = 1.41262528(29) (Chang et al. 2025).2025: Δσ = 0.518148806(24), Δε = 1.41262528(29)
Chang et al.
The dense-matter equation of state from neutron-star observations
Astrophysics & cosmology
Open. Gravitational-wave and NICER measurements put radii around 11–13.5 km, and the analyses do not fully agree.—
The origin of fast radio bursts
Astrophysics & cosmology
Open. Magnetars are an established source (SGR 1935+2154, 2020), but whether all FRBs share one origin is unresolved.—
Thresholds and decoders for quantum error-correcting codes under circuit-level noise
Quantum information
Open frontier. Surface codes now run below threshold in hardware (Google 2024/25), and qLDPC codes reach about 0.8% circuit-level thresholds.—

Chemistry & materials

ProblemWhere it standsLatest change
Density functional approximations with chemical accuracy
Chemistry
Open. Learned functionals such as Skala approach hybrid-level accuracy at semi-local cost, but no functional is uniformly chemically accurate.—
Electrochemical ammonia synthesis under ambient conditions
Chemistry
Open. Careful 15N2-controlled studies (Andersen et al., Nature 2019) found no verifiable ammonia from aqueous pure-metal catalysts; only lithium-mediated, non-aqueous synthesis is robustly confirmed.—
High-pressure hydride superconductors — prediction and verification
Materials
Open. H₃S and LaH₁₀ are the best-established hydride superconductors; the CSH (2020) and Lu–N–H (2023) claims were retracted, and newer room-temperature claims await reproduction.—
Prebiotic routes to nucleotides and the RNA world
Chemistry
Open. There is no demonstrated end-to-end, geochemically consistent route from simple feedstocks to self-replicating RNA, although key steps have been shown.—
Computational discovery of high-zT thermoelectrics
Materials
Open. The record bulk zT is about 3.1 (purified polycrystalline SnSe, 2021); predicting zT before synthesis remains unreliable.—
Crystal structure prediction of molecular solids
Chemistry
Open. In the seventh CCDC blind test (2024), periodic DFT-D ranking matched experiment for most targets, but generating and reliably ranking structures for complex targets remains unsolved.—
Long-term operational stability of perovskite solar cells
Materials
Open. Single-junction efficiencies are near 27% and perovskite–silicon tandems near 35%, but long-term operational stability remains the main barrier.—
Predicting and discovering fast lithium solid electrolytes
Materials
Open. The sulfide record is about 25 mS/cm (Kato et al. 2016); predicting conductivity from structure is still unreliable.—
Predicting glass-forming ability of metallic alloys
Materials
Open. Machine-learning models help find new glass-forming systems, but predicting glass-forming ability from composition alone remains unreliable.—
Predicting protein-ligand binding affinity
Chemistry
Open. Reported accuracy on CASF-2016 is inflated by train–test leakage; on leakage-filtered splits the best models reach Pearson R ≈ 0.8.—
Rare-earth-free permanent magnets ("gap magnets")
Materials
Open. No commercially viable rare-earth-free magnet fills the gap between ferrites (about 48 kJ/m³) and Nd-Fe-B (about 515 kJ/m³); screened candidates are unconfirmed experimentally.—
Selectivity in CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products
Chemistry
Open. Copper remains the only elemental catalyst making appreciable C2+ products, and selectivity is not yet predictable from computed descriptors.—
Visible-light photocatalysts for overall water splitting
Chemistry
Open. Near-unity quantum efficiency has been shown only in the UV (Al:SrTiO₃, Takata et al. 2020); the largest panel demonstration reached at most 0.76% solar-to-hydrogen efficiency.—

Life sciences

ProblemWhere it standsLatest change
A whole-nervous-system model of C. elegans that reproduces behaviour
Neuroscience
Open. Connectomes across development exist (Witvliet et al. 2021), but the measured signal-propagation atlas (Randi et al. 2023) departs from wiring-based predictions, and no model reproduces measured whole-brain activity and behaviour.—
RNA 3D structure prediction
Biology
Open. In CASP16 accuracy still depended on templates, with no significant gain over earlier rounds.—
The paradox of the plankton
Ecology
Open. Several mechanisms suffice in theory for coexistence (e.g. oscillations and chaos), but their relative contribution in real plankton communities is unresolved.—
Computational design of enzymes for chosen chemical reactions
Biology
Open. Fully computational designs now reach Kemp eliminase efficiencies above 10⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹ (Listov et al., Nature 2025) and serine hydrolases around 2×10⁵ (Lauko et al., Science 2025), but high hit rates for complex reactions are not routine.—
Genes of unknown function in a minimal cell
Biology
Open. JCVI-syn3A still has roughly 90 protein-coding genes of unknown function, about 30 of them essential.—
Predicting protein conformational ensembles
Biology
Open. In CASP16 only half of the ensemble targets were modelled well; generative emulators such as BioEmu are promising but not yet validated on populations in general.—

Earth & society

ProblemWhere it standsLatest change
Antarctic marine ice-sheet and ice-cliff instability
Earth science
Open. ISMIP6 models without ice-cliff instability project −7.8 to +30 cm of Antarctic sea-level contribution by 2100 under RCP8.5 (Seroussi et al. 2020); whether cliff instability matters this century is still contested.—
Narrowing equilibrium climate sensitivity
Climate
Open. IPCC AR6 assesses ECS at 3 °C (likely 2.5–4 °C, very likely 2–5 °C), consistent with Sherwood et al. 2020.—
Testable earthquake forecasting
Earth science
Open. Deterministic prediction has no demonstrated skill; probabilistic models are evaluated prospectively (CSEP), with modest gains over simple baselines.—
The equity premium puzzle
Economics
Open. No consensus explanation exists; habit formation, rare disasters, long-run risk and behavioural accounts all remain contenders.—
Attributing the renewed growth of atmospheric methane
Climate
Open. Atmospheric methane keeps rising (about 1939 ppb in 2026); how much of the post-2007 rise comes from emissions versus a weaker OH sink is disputed.—
ENSO prediction beyond one year
Climate
Open. Operational skill drops with lead time and across the spring barrier; deep-learning claims of skill beyond a year are still debated under strict hindcast protocols.—

Use this table

The text is CC BY 4.0: cite it as "Cairn Commons, Status of famous open problems (October 2026), https://cairn-commons.com/status". All problems with their platform status are in the open data (CSV and JSON). Want to move one of these? See which ones an AI can work on or get a task for your chatbot.