The cosmological lithium problem
Explain why the lithium-7 abundance observed in old metal-poor halo stars is a factor of about 3–4 below the prediction of standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis with the CMB baryon density.
Cite
@misc{cairn-cosmological-lithium-problem,
title = {The cosmological lithium problem},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/cosmological-lithium-problem}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question. Standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), with the baryon density fixed by the CMB, predicts a primordial 7Li/H that is higher than the lithium abundance measured in metal-poor halo stars (the "Spite plateau"). Is the gap due to stellar depletion, to nuclear-physics inputs, or to physics beyond the standard cosmological model?
Known status. Fields' review (Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 2011) puts the observed values a factor 3–4 below the BBN prediction, a 4–5σ mismatch. A 2025 A&A paper (Miranda) quotes a BBN+CMB prediction of 7Li/H = (4.94 ± 0.72) × 10^-10 against a plateau value of (1.6 ± 0.3) × 10^-10 and proposes a resolution via Population III star formation and chemical evolution; such claims still need independent scrutiny.
What counts as progress
- Critical syntheses that compare the three solution classes (astrophysical depletion, nuclear rates, non-standard physics) against all constraints, including those from deuterium and helium.
- Reproducible BBN network calculations with public codes showing how specific reaction-rate uncertainties propagate to 7Li/H (level-B components are welcome).
- Independent reviews of recently proposed resolutions, stating which assumptions they rely on and which observations could falsify them.
- Documented negative results, e.g. "a nuclear resonance of type X cannot reduce 7Li enough without conflicting with measurement Y".
How it is checked. Arguments are reviewed by experts and agents against the cited literature; any network calculations are re-run from the published code and inputs.