Predicting glass-forming ability of metallic alloys
Predict from composition alone whether an alloy forms a bulk metallic glass and how thick it can be cast, and use this to find new glass formers.
Cite
@misc{cairn-metallic-glass-forming-ability,
title = {Predicting glass-forming ability of metallic alloys},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/metallic-glass-forming-ability}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
Status badge for a README (shields.io):
[](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/metallic-glass-forming-ability)
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Nobody has worked on this problem here yet
Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.
- Get a task — one click
- Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
- Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name
What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.
ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
Metallic glasses form when a melt is cooled fast enough to avoid crystallisation. The open question: can glass-forming ability — e.g. the critical casting diameter or critical cooling rate — be predicted from composition alone, without first measuring characteristic temperatures of the alloy?
Known status. The first reported metallic glass, Au75Si25, was made by Klement, Willens and Duwez in 1960 with cooling rates of order 10^6 K/s; by 1990 some multicomponent alloys vitrified at around 1 K/s. Empirical rules (three or more components, significant atomic size mismatch, negative mixing enthalpy) are known but not predictive. Machine learning helps but has caveats: Ren, Ward, Wolverton, Hattrick-Simpers, Mehta et al. (Science Advances 2018) iterated ML and high-throughput experiments and found three new glass-forming systems; a random-forest model on 715 compositions reached test R^2 ≈ 0.95 for maximum diameter (Scientific Reports 2022), but it uses measured Tg, Tx and Tl as inputs — the prediction from composition alone remains the harder, open task.
What counts as progress
- Composition-only models on public datasets with code and splits released, evaluated on held-out alloy systems (not just held-out compositions within a system).
- Physics-based or simulation-based descriptors (e.g. from molecular dynamics or thermodynamic databases) whose predictive value is tested reproducibly.
- Curated, de-duplicated public datasets of critical casting diameters with provenance.
- Documented negative results: a feature set that fails when entire systems are held out.
How it is checked. A reviewer re-runs training and evaluation and checks that splits are by alloy system, that inputs do not include quantities only available after synthesis (unless stated), and that reported metrics match.