Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Graph theory P-wall-graph-conjecture84

Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 84

WOWII Conjecture 84 (status O): For a simple connected graph G with positive minimum degree, tree(G) ≥ 2 · rad(G) / δ(G), where tree(G) is the number of vertices in a largest induced subtree, rad(G) is the radius, and δ(G) = G.minDegree is the minimum degree.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-wall-graph-conjecture84,
  title        = {Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 84},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/wall-graph-conjecture84}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-11}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Fwall-graph-conjecture84.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/wall-graph-conjecture84)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

WOWII [Conjecture 84](http://cms.uhd.edu/faculty/delavinae/research/wowII/all.html#conj84) (status O):

For a simple connected graph G with positive minimum degree, tree(G) ≥ 2 · rad(G) / δ(G), where tree(G) is the number of vertices in a largest induced subtree, rad(G) is the radius, and δ(G) = G.minDegree is the minimum degree.

The hypothesis 0 < G.minDegree follows from connectedness on a nontrivial vertex set, but is stated explicitly so the theorem reads as a real-valued inequality without x / 0 corner cases.

Verbatim statement (WOWII #84, status O):

If G is a simple connected graph, then tree(G) ≥ 2 rad(G) / δ(G)

Source: http://cms.uhd.edu/faculty/delavinae/research/wowII/all.html#conj84

Here δ(G) is the minimum degree of G (lowercase delta in the WOWII HTML, rendered as <font face="Symbol">d</font>), not the average distance.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.WrittenOnTheWallII.GraphConjecture84.

theorem conjecture84 (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
    (h : G.Connected) (hδ : 0 < G.minDegree) :
    2 * (G.radius.toNat : ℝ) / (G.minDegree : ℝ) ≤ (largestInducedTreeSize G : ℝ)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

[E. DeLaVina, Written on the Wall II, Conjectures of Graffiti.pc](http://cms.dt.uh.edu/faculty/delavinae/research/wowII/)

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Written on the Wall II), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.