Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 133
WOWII Conjecture 133: For a simple connected graph G, path(G) ≥ rad(G) + (avg_v l(v))^cC_4(G), where path(G) is the path number of the graph (number of vertices of a largest induced path), rad(G) is the radius (minimum eccentricity, as a natural number), avg_v l(v) = l(G) is the average…
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-wall-graph-conjecture133,
title = {Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 133},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/wall-graph-conjecture133}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
WOWII [Conjecture 133](http://cms.dt.uh.edu/faculty/delavinae/research/wowII/):
For a simple connected graph , $\operatorname{path}(G) \ge \operatorname{rad}(G) + (\mathrm{avg}_v\, l(v))^{cC_4(G)}$, where is the path number of the graph (number of vertices of a largest induced path), is the radius (minimum eccentricity, as a natural number), is the average independence number of vertex neighbourhoods, and is the -free characteristic function (1 if is -free, not necessarily induced, and 0 otherwise).
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.WrittenOnTheWallII.GraphConjecture133.
theorem conjecture133 (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (h : G.Connected) :
let rad := G.radius.toNat
let hasC4 := ∃ a b c d : α, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ a ≠ d ∧ b ≠ c ∧ b ≠ d ∧ c ≠ d ∧
G.Adj a b ∧ G.Adj b c ∧ G.Adj c d ∧ G.Adj d a
let cC4 : ℕ := if hasC4 then 0 else 1
(rad : ℝ) + l G ^ cC4 ≤ (path G : ℝ)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
[E. DeLaVina, Written on the Wall II, Conjectures of Graffiti.pc](http://cms.dt.uh.edu/faculty/delavinae/research/wowII/)
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Written on the Wall II), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.