Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Algorithms P-poly-time-functions

Polynomial-time computability of factoring

The integer factorization problem: Can the prime factorization of a positive integer be computed in polynomial time? We state the problem by asking if Nat.primeFactorsList is polynomial-time computable (assuming typical encodings of ℕ and List ℕ into bitstrings). Reference: Wikipedia

Current state (tracked automatically)

  • Formal Conjectures marks the Lean statement isPolyTime_primeFactorsList as open.
All tracked facts and sources
FactValueSource
Formal Conjectures: status of `isPolyTime_primeFactorsList`research openFormal Conjectures
Formal Conjectures: research statements in the file1 open, 0 solvedFormal Conjectures

Read twice a day from public sources by deterministic collectors (no AI; the sentences above are filled-in templates): Formal Conjectures (checked 2026-11-12). How it works.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-poly-time-functions,
  title        = {Polynomial-time computability of factoring},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/poly-time-functions}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Fpoly-time-functions.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/poly-time-functions)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

The integer factorization problem: Can the prime factorization of a positive integer be computed in polynomial time?

We state the problem by asking if Nat.primeFactorsList is polynomial-time computable (assuming typical encodings of ℕ and List ℕ into bitstrings).

Reference: Wikipedia

This file formalizes the open problem of whether natural number / integer factorization can be computed in polynomial time on a deterministic classical Turing machine.

More precisely, it formalizes the following statement: Can the prime factorization of a natural number be computed in polynomial time (on a deterministic classical Turing machine)?

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.IntegerFactorization.

theorem isPolyTime_primeFactorsList : IsPolyTime Nat.primeFactorsList

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Wikipedia), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.