Ordered ways to write 2n = p + q with p, q and p_p+2 + 2 all prime
Conjecture: (i) a(n) > 0 for all n > 2.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-236566,
title = {Ordered ways to write 2n = p + q with p, q and p_p+2 + 2 all prime},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-236566}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-11}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
Status badge for a README (shields.io):
[](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-236566)
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Nobody has worked on this problem here yet
Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.
- Get a task — one click
- Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
- Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name
What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.
ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
conjecture_1. Conjecture: (i) for all .
conjecture_2. Conjecture: (ii) If , then can be written as with , and all prime.
Let denote the -th prime number. The sequence counts the number of ordered ways to write with , and all prime.
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«236566» (2 statements).
theorem conjecture_1 (n : ℕ) (hn : 2 < n) : 0 < a n
theorem conjecture_2 (n : ℕ) (hn : 30 < n) :
∃ p q : ℕ, p.Prime ∧ q.Prime ∧ (Nat.nth Nat.Prime (p + 1) + 2).Prime ∧
2 * n + 1 = 2 * p + q
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.