Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-oeis-3161

A binomial coefficient sum

Let b(n) = a(2n-1). Then the supercongruence b(n p^k) ≡ b(n p^k-1) pmodp^3k holds for positive integers n and k and all primes p ≥ 5. - Zhi-Wei Sun, Nov 16 2019

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-3161,
  title        = {A binomial coefficient sum},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-3161}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Let . Then the supercongruence holds for positive integers and and all primes .

  • Zhi-Wei Sun, Nov 16 2019

A binomial coefficient sum: where .

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«3161».

theorem conjecture (n k p : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) (hk : 0 < k) (hp : p.Prime) (hp_ge : 5 ≤ p) :
    (b (n * p ^ k) : ℤ) ≡ (b (n * p ^ (k - 1)) : ℤ) [ZMOD (p : ℤ) ^ (3 * k)]

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.