Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-oeis-228425

Partitions of n into x + y with x(x+1)/2 + y^2 prime

Conjecture: a(n) > 0 for all n > 1.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-228425,
  title        = {Partitions of n into x + y with x(x+1)/2 + y^2 prime},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-228425}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-11}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Foeis-228425.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-228425)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

conjecture_1. Conjecture: for all .

conjecture_2. We also conjecture that any integer can be written as () with prime, if and only if is among .

conjecture_3. The pair works if is among , and is not congruent to modulo , in the sense that all sufficiently large integers can be written as () with prime.

  • _Zhi-Wei Sun_

conjecture_4. For , the pair works (with ) if is congruent to or modulo , in the sense that all sufficiently large integers can be written as () with prime.

  • _Zhi-Wei Sun_

conjecture_5. The only pairs with and such that any integer can be written as () with prime, are the pairs in sunPolygonalPairs.

  • _Zhi-Wei Sun_

Number of ways to write () with prime.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«228425» (5 statements).

theorem conjecture_1 (n : ℕ) (hn : n > 1) : a n > 0
theorem conjecture_2 (k : ℕ) (hk : 3 ≤ k) :
    (∀ n : ℕ, 1 < n → ∃ x y : ℕ, 0 < x ∧ 0 < y ∧ x + y = n ∧
      Nat.Prime (Nat.polygonalNumber k x + Nat.polygonalNumber (k + 1) y)) ↔
    k = 3 ∨ k = 39 ∨ k = 99
theorem conjecture_3 (k m : ℕ) (hk : k = 3 ∨ k = 4 ∨ k = 6) (hm : k < m)
    (hmod : ¬ m ≡ k [MOD 2]) :
    ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∃ x y : ℕ, 0 < x ∧ 0 < y ∧ x + y = n ∧
      Nat.Prime (Nat.polygonalNumber k x + Nat.polygonalNumber m y)
theorem conjecture_4 (m : ℕ) (hm : 5 < m) (hmod : m ≡ 0 [MOD 6] ∨ m ≡ 4 [MOD 6]) :
    ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∃ x y : ℕ, 0 < x ∧ 0 < y ∧ x + y = n ∧
      Nat.Prime (Nat.polygonalNumber 5 x + Nat.polygonalNumber m y)
theorem conjecture_5 (k m : ℕ) (hk : 2 < k) (hk10 : k ≤ 10) (hm : k < m) (hm100 : m ≤ 100) :
    (∀ n : ℕ, 1 < n → ∃ x y : ℕ, 0 < x ∧ 0 < y ∧ x + y = n ∧
      Nat.Prime (Nat.polygonalNumber k x + Nat.polygonalNumber m y)) ↔
    (k, m) ∈ sunPolygonalPairs

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.