Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-oeis-218656

Partitions 2n + 1 = x + y with x^4 + y^4 prime

Conjecture: a(n) > 0 for all n ≥ 1.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-218656,
  title        = {Partitions 2n + 1 = x + y with x^4 + y^4 prime},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-218656}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-11}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Foeis-218656.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-218656)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

conjecture_1. Conjecture: for all .

conjecture_2. Conjecture: If in the definition of is replaced by , then the count is positive for all .

  • _Thomas Ordowski_, Nov 03 2012

conjecture_3. Conjecture: If in the definition of is replaced by , then the count is positive for all except for (i.e., ).

  • _Thomas Ordowski_, Nov 03 2012; exceptions noted by _Mauro Fiorentini_, Sep 22 2023

conjecture_4. Conjecture: If in the definition of is replaced by , then the count is positive for all except for (i.e., ).

  • _Thomas Ordowski_, Nov 03 2012; exceptions noted by _Mauro Fiorentini_, Sep 22 2023

For , is the number of ways to write as with such that is prime.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«218656» (4 statements).

theorem conjecture_1 (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : 0 < a n
theorem conjecture_2 (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
    ∃ x : ℕ, 1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ n ∧ Nat.Prime (x ^ 2 + (2 * n + 1 - x) ^ 2)
theorem conjecture_3 (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (h_exc : n ∉ ({3, 4, 27, 36, 37, 52} : Set ℕ)) :
    ∃ x : ℕ, 1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ n ∧ Nat.Prime (x ^ 8 + (2 * n + 1 - x) ^ 8)
theorem conjecture_4 (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (h_exc : n ∉ ({2, 4} : Set ℕ)) :
    ∃ x : ℕ, 1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ n ∧ Nat.Prime (x ^ 16 + (2 * n + 1 - x) ^ 16)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.