Ben Green's Open Problem 93
Is a random polynomial with coefficients in 0,1 and nonzero constant term almost surely irreducible? More precisely, writing p_n for the probability that 1 + a_1 x + ⋯ + a_n-1 x^n-1 + x^n is irreducible, where the a_i are independent and take the values 0 and 1 with equal probability, does p_n → 1?
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-green-93,
title = {Ben Green's Open Problem 93},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/green-93}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
Status badge for a README (shields.io):
[](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/green-93)
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Nobody has worked on this problem here yet
Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.
- Get a task — one click
- Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
- Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name
What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.
ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Is a random polynomial with coefficients in and nonzero constant term almost surely irreducible?
More precisely, writing for the probability that is irreducible, where the are independent and take the values and with equal probability, does ?
The probability is irreducibleProb 1 n. The conjecture is due to Odlyzko and Poonen [BrVa19, Section 1].
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«93».
theorem green_93 : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ irreducibleProb 1 n) atTop (𝓝 1)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
- [Gr24] Green, Ben. "100 open problems." (2024).
- [BrVa19] Breuillard, E. and Varjú, P. P., *Irreducibility of random polynomials of large degree*. Acta Math. 223 (2019), 195--249. arXiv:1810.13360
- [BSKK23] Bary-Soroker, L., Koukoulopoulos, D. and Kozma, G., *Irreducibility of random polynomials: general measures*. Invent. Math. 233 (2023), 1041--1120. arXiv:2007.14567
- [Ko99] Konyagin, S. V., On the number of irreducible polynomials with 0,1 coefficients. Acta Arith. 88 (1999), 333--350.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Ben Green's 100 open problems), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.