Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Combinatorics P-green-18

Ben Green's Open Problem 18

Suppose that G is a finite group, and let A ⊂ G × G be a subset of density α. Is it true that there are ≫_α |G|^3 triples x, y, g such that (x, y), (gx, y), (x, gy) all lie in A? Note: A is taken as α-dense, i.e. |A| ≥ α |G|^2 [Au16, Question 2]

Current state (tracked automatically)

  • Formal Conjectures marks the Lean statement green_18 as open.
All tracked facts and sources
FactValueSource
Formal Conjectures: status of `green_18`research openFormal Conjectures
Formal Conjectures: research statements in the file1 open, 1 solvedFormal Conjectures

Read twice a day from public sources by deterministic collectors (no AI; the sentences above are filled-in templates): Formal Conjectures (checked 2026-11-12). How it works.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-green-18,
  title        = {Ben Green's Open Problem 18},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/green-18}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Fgreen-18.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/green-18)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Suppose that is a finite group, and let be a subset of density . Is it true that there are triples such that all lie in ?

Note: A is taken as -dense, i.e. [Au16, Question 2]

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«18».

theorem green_18 :
    ∀ α > 0, ∃ c > 0, ∃ m₀ : ℕ,
      ∀ (G : Type*) [Group G] [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (A : Finset (G × G)),
      Fintype.card G ≥ m₀ →
      (A.card : ℝ) ≥ α * (Fintype.card G) ^ 2 →
      (numNaiveCorners A : ℝ) ≥ c * (Fintype.card G) ^ 3

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

  • [Gr26] Ben Green's Open Problem 18
  • [Au16] Austin, Tim. "Ajtai–Szemerédi theorems over quasirandom groups." Recent trends in combinatorics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. 453-484.
  • [So13] Solymosi, Jozsef. "Roth-type theorems in finite groups." European Journal of Combinatorics 34.8 (2013): 1454-1458.
  • [Go01] Gowers, William T. "A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem." Geometric & Functional Analysis GAFA 11.3 (2001): 465-588.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Ben Green's 100 open problems), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.