Pittel's stable-matching hyperbola threshold conjecture

Pittel conjectures a threshold p_(n) for the rank pairs across stable matchings to trace out a hyperbola. For all sufficiently large n, it lies between 9/4(log n)^2/n and 1. The fixed reciprocal arc (t,t^-1) for t ∈ [2/3,3/2] specifies the curve to cover in this formulation.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)

Cite

@misc{cairn-arxiv-2406-10319-stable-matching-hyperbola,
  title        = {Pittel's stable-matching hyperbola threshold conjecture},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/arxiv-2406-10319-stable-matching-hyperbola}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-11}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Farxiv-2406-10319-stable-matching-hyperbola.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/arxiv-2406-10319-stable-matching-hyperbola)

Claims

Verified

Disputed

Refuted

On the literature board

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

Get a task — one click

Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab

Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

The problem

The question

Pittel conjectures a threshold $p_{*} (n)$ for the rank pairs across stable matchings to trace out a hyperbola. For all sufficiently large $n$ , it lies between $\frac{9}{4} (lo g n)^{2} / n$ and $1$ .

The fixed reciprocal arc $(t, t^{- 1})$ for $t \in [2/3, 3/2]$ specifies the curve to cover in this formulation. For each fixed $0 < δ < 1$ , compare probabilities at distance at least $δ min (p_{*} (n), 1 - p_{*} (n))$ from the threshold. The relative margin keeps both comparison ranges nonempty. On the upper range, the event holds with high probability uniformly at every positive tolerance. On the lower range, it fails with high probability uniformly at one positive tolerance for each $δ$ .

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Arxiv.«2406.10319».StableMatchingHyperbola.

theorem pittel_hyperbola_threshold :
    ∃ pStar : ℕ → Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1,
      let d (n : ℕ) := min (pStar n : ℝ) (1 - (pStar n : ℝ))
      (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, (9 / 4 : ℝ) * (Real.log n) ^ 2 / n < (pStar n : ℝ)) ∧
      ∀ δ ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1,
        (∀ ε > 0, Tendsto (fun n ↦
          ⨆ p : {p : unitInterval // (pStar n : ℝ) + δ * d n ≤ (p : ℝ)},
            marketLaw n p.1 (hyperbolaEvent n p.1 ε)ᶜ) atTop (𝓝 0)) ∧
        ∃ ε > 0, Tendsto (fun n ↦
          ⨆ p : {p : unitInterval // (p : ℝ) ≤ (pStar n : ℝ) - δ * d n},
            marketLaw n p.1 (hyperbolaEvent n p.1 ε)) atTop (𝓝 0)

What counts as progress

A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

On Constrained Matchings, Stable Under Random Preferences by Boris Pittel, Section 6, Notes (2). The conjecture also appears in the arXiv preprint, p. 26.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (arXiv papers), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.