Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Analysis P-arxiv-math-0110202-banach-mazur-rotation

Banach-Mazur Rotation Problem

The Banach–Mazur rotation problem asks whether every separable Banach space whose group of linear isometric equivalences acts transitively on the unit sphere is linearly isometric to a Hilbert space.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-arxiv-math-0110202-banach-mazur-rotation,
  title        = {Banach-Mazur Rotation Problem},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/arxiv-math-0110202-banach-mazur-rotation}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

The Banach--Mazur rotation problem asks whether every separable Banach space whose group of linear isometric equivalences acts transitively on the unit sphere is linearly isometric to a Hilbert space.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Arxiv.«math.0110202».BanachMazurRotation. answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem banach_mazur_rotation_problem : answer(sorry) ↔
    ∀ (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] [SeparableSpace E]
      [IsPretransitive (E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E) (sphere (0 : E) 1)], ∃ (H : Type*) (_ : NormedAddCommGroup H)
      (_ : InnerProductSpace ℝ H),
      Nonempty (E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] H)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (arXiv papers), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.