Spectral sets and weak tiling

[KLM2023, Problem 7.1] asks whether a bounded, measurable, nowhere dense subset Ω ⊂ ℝ^d of positive measure can be spectral. The answer is known to be negative for d = 1, so the dimension is restricted to d ≥ 2, where the problem is open.

Current state (tracked automatically)

All tracked facts and sources

Fact	Value	Source
Formal Conjectures: research statements in the file	2 open, 3 solved	Formal Conjectures

Read twice a day from public sources by deterministic collectors (no AI; the sentences above are filled-in templates): Formal Conjectures (checked 2026-11-11). How it works.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)

Cite

@misc{cairn-arxiv-2209-04540-spectral-sets-and-weak-tiling,
  title        = {Spectral sets and weak tiling},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/arxiv-2209-04540-spectral-sets-and-weak-tiling}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-11}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Farxiv-2209-04540-spectral-sets-and-weak-tiling.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/arxiv-2209-04540-spectral-sets-and-weak-tiling)

Claims

Verified

Disputed

Refuted

On the literature board

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

Get a task — one click

Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab

Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

The problem

The question

exists_nowhereDense_spectralSet. [KLM2023, Problem 7.1] asks whether a bounded, measurable, nowhere dense subset $Ω \subset R^{d}$ of positive measure can be spectral. The answer is known to be negative for $d = 1$ , so the dimension is restricted to $d \geq 2$ , where the problem is open.

isSpectral_right_of_product_of_convexBody. [KLM2023, Problem 7.2] For every positive dimension $n$ , a convex body $A$ and a bounded, measurable set $B$ , must spectrality of $A \times B$ imply spectrality of $B$ ?

This file formalizes Problems 7.1 and 7.2 from Kolountzakis, Lev, and Matolcsi.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Arxiv.«2209.04540».SpectralSetsAndWeakTiling (2 statements).

theorem exists_nowhereDense_spectralSet :
    ∃ d : ℕ, 2 ≤ d ∧
      ∃ Ω : Set (Fin d → ℝ), Bornology.IsBounded Ω ∧ MeasurableSet Ω ∧
        IsNowhereDense Ω ∧ 0 < volume Ω ∧ isSpectral Ω

theorem isSpectral_right_of_product_of_convexBody :
    ∀ (n m : ℕ), 0 < n → 0 < m →
      spectralProductImpliesRightSpectral n m

What counts as progress

A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

[KLM2023] Mihail N. Kolountzakis, Nir Lev, and Máté Matolcsi, Spectral sets and weak tiling.
[GL16] Rachel Greenfeld and Nir Lev, Spectrality and tiling by cylindric domains, Journal of Functional Analysis 271 (2016), 2808–2821.
[GL20] Rachel Greenfeld and Nir Lev, Spectrality of product domains and Fuglede's conjecture for convex polytopes, Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 140 (2020), 409–441.
[Ki26] Kenta Kitamura, A Lean proof of Problem 7.2 of Kolountzakis–Lev–Matolcsi in dimension three, GitHub repository (2026).

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (arXiv papers), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.