Equivalents to the Riemann Hypothesis
The statement that Robin's criterion holds.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-paper-riemann-hypothesis-equivalents,
title = {Equivalents to the Riemann Hypothesis},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/paper-riemann-hypothesis-equivalents}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
Status badge for a README (shields.io):
[](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/paper-riemann-hypothesis-equivalents)
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Nobody has worked on this problem here yet
Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.
- Get a task — one click
- Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
- Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name
What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.
ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
robin_criterion_rhs. The statement that Robin's criterion holds.
lagarias_criterion_rhs. The statement that Lagarias' criterion holds.
li_criterion_rhs. The statement that Li's criterion holds.
beurling_nyman_criterion_rhs. The statement that the Beurling-Nyman criterion holds.
weil_positivity_criterion_rhs. The statement that the Weil criterion holds.
This file contains formal statements that are known to be equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis, following the survey [Co26], §4. The statement of the Riemann Hypothesis itself is in FormalConjectures.Millennium.RiemannHypothesis.
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Paper.RiemannHypothesisEquivalents (5 statements).
theorem robin_criterion_rhs {n : ℕ} (hn : n > 5040) :
σ 1 n < exp eulerMascheroniConstant * n * log (log n)
theorem lagarias_criterion_rhs {n : ℕ} (hn : 1 < n) :
σ 1 n < harmonic n + exp (harmonic n) * log (harmonic n)
theorem li_criterion_rhs {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : 0 < lambda n
theorem beurling_nyman_criterion_rhs :
Dense { fractScalarInvSumL2 n c θ | (n) (c) (θ)
(hθ : ∀ ν, θ ν ∈ Set.Ioc 0 1) (h : ∑ ν, c ν * θ ν = 0) }
theorem weil_positivity_criterion_rhs {g : C_c(ℝ, ℝ)} (hg : ContDiff ℝ ∞ g)
(h : IsTestFunction g) :
weilArchimedean (g ⋆ fun x ↦ g (-x)) +
∑' p : Nat.Primes, weilNonArchimedean p (g ⋆ fun x ↦ g (-x)) ≤ 0
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
- [Co26] A. Connes, [The Riemann Hypothesis: Past, Present and a Letter Through Time](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04022), 2026.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (research papers), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.