Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Combinatorics P-paper-irving-leather-stable-matchings

The Irving–Leather conjecture on stable matchings

Thurber's §2 attributes to Irving and Leather the conjecture that their construction attains the maximum number of stable matchings at every power-of-two size.

Current state (tracked automatically)

All tracked facts and sources
FactValueSource
Formal Conjectures: research statements in the file2 open, 0 solvedFormal Conjectures

Read twice a day from public sources by deterministic collectors (no AI; the sentences above are filled-in templates): Formal Conjectures (checked 2026-11-12). How it works.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-paper-irving-leather-stable-matchings,
  title        = {The Irving–Leather conjecture on stable matchings},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/paper-irving-leather-stable-matchings}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Fpaper-irving-leather-stable-matchings.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/paper-irving-leather-stable-matchings)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

irving_leather_pow_two. Thurber's §2 attributes to Irving and Leather the conjecture that their construction attains the maximum number of stable matchings at every power-of-two size.

irving_leather_growth_rate. A proposed weaker variant states that and converge to the same real number. Thomas's recurrence analysis gives approximately for the second limit. The first sequence is indexed by to start at positive sizes.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Paper.IrvingLeatherStableMatchings (2 statements).

theorem irving_leather_pow_two (k : ℕ) :
    maxStableMatchings (2 ^ k) = irvingLeatherCount k
theorem irving_leather_growth_rate :
    ∃ c : ℝ,
      Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ Real.rpow (maxStableMatchings (n + 1) : ℝ)
        (1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1))) atTop (𝓝 c) ∧
      Tendsto (fun k : ℕ ↦ Real.rpow (irvingLeatherCount k : ℝ)
        (1 / (2 : ℝ) ^ k)) atTop (𝓝 c)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Let be the maximum number of stable matchings with participants per side and complete, strict preferences. The Irving–Leather construction has stable matchings at size .

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (research papers), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.