Matrix multiplications and AM-GM inequalities
For positive-semidefinite d × d matrices A_1, …, A_n and any unitarily invariant norm |||·||| (including the operator norm and Schatten p-norms) and m ≤ n, define C(n,m,d) := inf frac 1/n^m Σ_j_1, j_2, …, j_m = 1^n |||A_j_1A_j_2… A_j_m||| (n-m)!/n! Σ_substackj_1, j_2, …, j_m = 1 \ all distinct^n…
From the catalogue. Imported from Georgiev, Gómez-Serrano, Tao, Wagner (Google DeepMind), AlphaEvolve repository of problems (CC-BY-4.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-matrix-multiplications-and-am-gm-inequalities,
title = {Matrix multiplications and AM-GM inequalities},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/matrix-multiplications-and-am-gm-inequalities}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The problem
For positive-semidefinite matrices and any unitarily invariant norm (including the operator norm and Schatten -norms) and , define where the infimum is taken over all matrices and invariant norms . What is ?
What counts as progress
- A better construction or bound, with code that re-computes its value (reproducible) — ideally verified by an independent re-run.
- A proof that a known construction is optimal, or a better bound on the other side.
- Literature: earlier or newer records (literature claims).
Source and licence
Imported from the AlphaEvolve repository of problems (Georgiev, Gómez-Serrano, Tao, Wagner — Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale, 2025), commit 8f447457957d. Text under CC BY 4.0, code under Apache 2.0; reformatted for this page.