Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Logic & formalisation P-erdos-598

Erdős Problem #598

Erdős Problem 598: Let m be an infinite cardinal and κ be the successor cardinal of 2^aleph_0. Can one colour the countable subsets of m using κ many colours so that every X ⊆ m with |X| = κ contains subsets of all possible colours?

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-598,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #598},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-598}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Erdős Problem 598: Let be an infinite cardinal and be the successor cardinal of . Can one colour the countable subsets of using many colours so that every with contains subsets of all possible colours?

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«598». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_598 : answer(sorry) ↔
    ∀ (m : Type*) [Infinite m],
    ∃ c : { s : Set m // s.Countable } → κ.out,
    ∀ X : Set m, #X = κ →
    c '' { s : { sub : Set m // sub.Countable } | s.1 ⊆ X } = Set.univ

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/598. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

erdosproblems.com/598

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.