Skip to content
Mathematics · 10 open problems

Open problems in logic & formalisation

Formalisation itself: turning informal mathematics into Lean statements and proofs that the kernel checks, plus open questions in logic and foundations.

Level A · Machine-checkable sub-problem

Lean formalisation of Busy Beaver deciders and results

Port the machine-checked Busy Beaver results, such as BB(5) = 47,176,870 and BB(2,4) = 3,932,964 (proved in Coq/Rocq by bbchallenge), and the sound deciders behind them to Lean 4. This gives an independent second formal verification and a reusable library.

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Busy Beaver

Determine the value of the Busy Beaver function at n = 6.

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Erdős Problem #1176

Let G be a graph with chromatic number aleph_1. Is it true that there is a colouring of the edges with aleph_1 many colours such that, in any countable colouring of the vertices, there exists a vertex colour containing all edge colours? A problem of Erdős, Galvin, and Hajnal.

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Erdős Problem #592

Determine which countable ordinals β have the property that, if α = ω^β, then in any red/blue colouring of the edges of K_α there is either a red K_α or a blue K_3.

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Erdős Problem #598

Erdős Problem 598: Let m be an infinite cardinal and κ be the successor cardinal of 2^aleph_0. Can one colour the countable subsets of m using κ many colours so that every X ⊆ m with |X| = κ contains subsets of all possible colours?

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Erdős Problem #602

Does every almost-disjoint family of countably infinite sets whose pairwise intersections all have size ≠ 1 have Property B? Formally: let α be any type, let (A_i)_i ∈ I be a family of countably infinite subsets of α such that for all i ≠ j, the intersection A_i ∩ A_j is finite and |A_i ∩ A_j| ≠ 1.

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Erdős Problem #623

Let X be a set of cardinality aleph_ω and f be a function from the finite subsets of X to X such that f(A)not∈ A for all A. Must there exist an infinite Y⊆ X that is independent - that is, for all finite B⊂ Y we have f(B)not∈ Y?

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Erdős Problem #70

Erdős Problem 70: Let c be the order type of the real numbers, let β be a countable ordinal, and let 2 ≤ n < ω. Is it true that c → (β, n)^3_2? Note: The cases n ≤ 3 are trivially true (compare omega_three), so the genuine content of the conjecture begins at n = 4.

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Tarski's exponential function problem

Tarski's exponential function problem. Is the first-order theory of the real exponential field ℝ_exp = (ℝ, +, ·, -, 0, 1, ≤, exp) decidable?

0claims
0verified
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Lean statement

Vaught conjecture

The Vaught conjecture states that for a countable language L and a complete L-Theory T the number of countable models of T (up to isomorphism) is finite, aleph_0 or 2^aleph_0.

0claims
0verified

How to contribute in logic & formalisation

  1. Get a task matched to your ability: a review, a lemma, a computation, a literature find or a documented dead end.
  2. Work on it with your model — a free chatbot through copy–paste prompts, or an agent connected over MCP.
  3. Submit a claim with evidence. It is checked by a machine where possible (Lean, certificate checkers), re-run where practical, and otherwise reviewed with stated reasons.

Everything is published under CC BY 4.0 with authorship recorded. How it works