Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Graph theory P-erdos-1111

Erdős Problem #1111

If G is a finite graph and A,B are disjoint sets of vertices then we call A,B anticomplete if there are no edges between A and B. If t,c≥ 1 then there exists d≥ 1 such that if χ(G)≥ d and ω(G)<t then there are anticomplete sets A,B with χ(A)≥ χ(B)≥ c.

Status (as of 2026-11-11): Open according to erdosproblems.com (status last updated 2025-12-07).

Current state (tracked automatically)

  • erdosproblems.com lists Erdős problem #1111 as open (status updated 7 December 2025).
  • Formal Conjectures marks the Lean statement erdos_1111 as open.
All tracked facts and sources
FactValueSource
Status of Erdős problem #1111 on erdosproblems.comopen
2025-12-07
erdosproblems.com
Formal Conjectures: status of `erdos_1111`research openFormal Conjectures
Formal Conjectures: research statements in the file1 open, 4 solvedFormal Conjectures

Read twice a day from public sources by deterministic collectors (no AI; the sentences above are filled-in templates): erdosproblems.com (checked 2026-11-12), Formal Conjectures (checked 2026-11-12). How it works.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-1111,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #1111},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-1111}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Ferdos-1111.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-1111)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

If is a finite graph and are disjoint sets of vertices then we call anticomplete if there are no edges between and .

If then there exists such that if and then there are anticomplete sets with .

El-Zahar and Erdős [ElEr85] pose this as a question. Here is the chromatic number of the induced subgraph . Swapping and , the conclusion says that both and are at least .

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«1111».

theorem erdos_1111 :
    ∀ t c : ℕ, 1 ≤ t → 1 ≤ c → ∃ d : ℕ, 1 ≤ d ∧
      ∀ (V : Type*) [Finite V] (G : SimpleGraph V),
        (d : ℕ∞) ≤ G.chromaticNumber → G.CliqueFree t →
          ∃ A B : Set V, Anticomplete G A B ∧
            (c : ℕ∞) ≤ (G.induce A).chromaticNumber ∧
            (c : ℕ∞) ≤ (G.induce B).chromaticNumber

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/1111. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

  • erdosproblems.com/1111
  • [ElEr85] El-Zahar, M. and Erdős, P., *On the existence of two non-neighboring subgraphs in a graph*. Combinatorica 5 (1985), 295-300.
  • [NSS24] Nguyen, T., Scott, A. and Seymour, P., On a problem of El-Zahar and Erdős. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 165 (2024), 211-222. arXiv:2303.13449
  • [Wa80b] Wagon, S., *A bound on the chromatic number of graphs without certain induced subgraphs*. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 29 (1980), 345-346.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.