Erdős Problem #723
If there is a finite projective plane of order n then must n be a prime power?
Extremal and additive combinatorics are full of questions where a single construction or a sharper bound is real progress — cap sets, Ramsey numbers, sunflowers, union-closed families. Many results are machine-checkable: a certificate is verified by a deterministic checker, a proof by the Lean kernel.
If there is a finite projective plane of order n then must n be a prime power?
Let ε>0. Does there exist A⊆ ℕ such that the lower density of A+A is at least 1-ε and yet 1_Aast 1_A(n) ≪_ε 1 for all n?
Let h(n) be maximal such that if A⊆ ℤ with lvert Arvert=n then there is B⊆ A with lvert Brvert ≥ h(n) such that if a_1+⋯+a_r=b_1+⋯+b_s with a_i,b_i∈ B then r=s. Estimate h(n).
Erdős Problem #817
Estimate m(n,k), or better give an asymptotic formula.
Let G be an abelian group of size N, and suppose that A ⊂ G has density α. Are there at least α^15 N^10 tuples (x_1, …, x_5, y_1, …, y_5) ∈ G^10 such that x_i + y_j ∈ A whenever j ∈ i, i+1, i+2? Note: We interpret indices modulo 5.
Does there exist a Lipschitz function f : ℕ → ℤ whose graph Γ = (n, f(n)) : n ∈ ℕ ⊆ ℤ^2 is free of 3-term progressions?
If 1, …, N is r-coloured then, for N geqslant N_0(r), there are integers x, y geqslant 3 such that x + y, xy have the same colour. Find reasonable bounds for N_0(r). The goal is to improve upon the Green-Sawhney bound.
If A is a set of n integers, what is the maximum number of affine translates of the set lbrace 0,1,3 rbrace that A can contain? Conjectured in [Aa19] p.579: (1/3 + o(1)) n^2.
For which values of k is the following true: whenever we partition [N] = A_1 ∪ … ∪ A_k, |bigcup^k_i=1 (A_i hat+ A_i)| ≥ 1/10 N?
What is the size of the smallest set A ⊂ ℤ / pℤ (with at least two elements) for which no element in the sumset A + A has a unique representation?
Let p be a prime and let A ⊂ ℤ/pℤ be a set of size ⌊ √(p) ⌋. Is there a dilate of A containing a gap of length 100√(p)?
Do the following exist, for arbitrarily large n? An abelian group H with |H| = n^2+o(1), together with subsets A_1, ..., A_n, B_1, ..., B_n satisfying |A_i||B_i| ≥ n^2-o(1) and |A_i + B_i| = |A_i||B_i|, such that the sets A_i + B_i are disjoint from the sets A_j + B_k (j ≠ k)?
Can we improve the best upper bound? The base c must be positive, since =O compares norms.
If A ⊂ ℤ/pℤ is random, |A| = √(p), can we almost surely cover ℤ/pℤ with 100√(p) translates of A? [Gr24]
Suppose that A ⊂ 𝔽_2^n is a set of density α. What is the largest size of coset guaranteed to be contained in 2A? We phrase this by asking for the exact function F(α, n) giving the maximum dimension of a guaranteed coset.
Suppose that A ⊂ 𝔽_2^n is a set with an additive complement of size K. Does 2A contain a coset of codimension O_K(1)?
Suppose that 𝔽_2^n is partitioned in to sets A_1, ..., A_K. Does 2A_i contain a coset of codimension O_K(1) for some i?
Problem 9 (ii): is r_5(N) ≪ N(log N)^-c?
If x is a fusible number and y is its successor, then the interval [x + 1, y + 1) can be divided into intervals [ℓₙ, ℓₙ₊₁), such that the fusible numbers in [ℓₙ, ℓₙ₊₁) are obtained by fusing the n + 1st successor of x with a fusible number.
For N = 6 and all D ≥ 3, does there exist no solution to the monochromatic quantum graph equation system over ℂ?
Conjecture: let p ≤ n be prime. If m and p^a m are two such products, then so is p^k m for all 0 < k < a. - Yan Sheng Ang, Feb 13 2020
The open problem: determine the Ramsey number R(5,5). It is known that 43 ≤ R(5,5) ≤ 46.
Wichmann's conjecture on optimal rulers. Every optimal ruler of sufficiently large length is a Wichmann ruler W(r, s) (up to reflection, i.e. reversing the segment list). Posed by Wichmann [Wi63].
Construct an S(t, k, n)-Steiner system with n > k > t > 5, t < 10, and n < 200. No example of a Steiner system with t > 5 is known, despite a 2014 existence theorem by Keevash showing that such systems must exist for sufficiently large n. Reference: Large Steiner Systems
F(n) ≤ n^3/2.
Every convex set in ℝ^3 has VC_2 dimension at most 2.
WOWII Conjecture 40 For a nontrivial connected graph G the size f(G) of a largest induced forest satisfies f(G) ≥ ceil((p(G) + b(G) + 1)/2) where p(G) is the path cover number and b(G) is the largest induced bipartite subgraph size.
Everything is published under CC BY 4.0 with authorship recorded. How it works