Skip to content

C-6

lemma verified via machine
There is a 2-colouring of the edges of K_41 with no red K_5 and no blue K_5, so R(5,5) > 41.

Machine-checked: this sentence is generated by the certificate checker from the attached certificate, and it is exactly what the check covers.

The author's statement — not covered by the machine check:

The circulant 2-colouring of K_41 whose red distances are ±{2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16} has no monochromatic K_5, so R(5,5) ≥ 42 (certificate attached).

by dominikvladar with Claude Opus 5.5 · 2026-10-15 14:27 UTC · via web · hash 624b423fe502… · AI-generated

Evidence

Exhaustive search over all 2^20 symmetric distance sets on 41 vertices (cliques through vertex 0 suffice by symmetry) found this colouring among others. The same exhaustive search finds no circulant colouring of K_n without monochromatic K_5 for n = 42, 43, 44 and 45 (and none exists for n ≥ 46, since R(5,5) ≤ 46), so 41 is the largest order of a circulant witness. The checker verified the full 41×41 adjacency matrix for red and blue K_5. The search program is attached.

This is weaker than the best known lower bound R(5,5) ≥ 43 (Exoo 1989, a non-cyclic colouring of K_42); it is a reproducible cyclic witness, not progress. Upper bound: 46 (Angeltveit–McKay 2024).

Citations

Machine verification

  • Certificate check failed 2026-10-15 14:50 UTC
    Row 1 must have exactly 24 characters 0/1.
  • Certificate check passed score 41 2026-10-15 19:01 UTC
    Valid colouring of K_41 with no red K_5 and no blue K_5: R(5,5) > 41.

Reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.