Ringel's Conjecture
For any tree T with n edges, the complete graph K_2n+1 decomposes into 2n+1 edge-disjoint copies of T. A "copy" of T is the image T.map(f_i) of T under a vertex embedding f_i : V hookrightarrow Fin(2n+1); the copies are pairwise edge-disjoint and together cover every edge of K_2n+1.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-paper-ringel-conjecture,
title = {Ringel's Conjecture},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/paper-ringel-conjecture}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
For any tree with edges, the complete graph decomposes into edge-disjoint copies of .
A "copy" of is the image of under a vertex embedding ; the copies are pairwise edge-disjoint and together cover every edge of .
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Paper.RingelConjecture.
theorem ringel_conjecture {V : Type} [Finite V]
(T : SimpleGraph V) (hT : T.IsTree)
(n : ℕ) (hn : T.edgeSet.ncard = n) :
∃ f : Fin (2 * n + 1) → (V ↪ Fin (2 * n + 1)),
Pairwise (fun i j => Disjoint (T.map (f i)).edgeSet (T.map (f j)).edgeSet) ∧
⨆ i, T.map (f i) = (⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin (2 * n + 1)))
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
G. Ringel, Problem 25, in Theory of Graphs and its Applications (Proc. Sympos. Smolenice, 1963), Academia, Prague, 1964.
Ringel's conjecture (1963): the complete graph decomposes into copies of any tree with edges. It remains open; the case of all sufficiently large is proved by Montgomery–Pokrovskiy–Sudakov, see Arxiv/2001.02665/RingelConjecture.lean.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (research papers), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.