Number of primes p such that n^n ≤ p ≤ n^n + n^2
Question: for any n > 0, is there at least one prime p such that n^n ≤ p ≤ n^n + n^2? In this case, that would be stronger than the Schinzel conjecture: "for m > 1 there's at least one prime p such that m ≤ p ≤ m + log(m)^2" since n^2 < log(n^n)^2 = n^2 log(n)^2.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-69922,
title = {Number of primes p such that n^n ≤ p ≤ n^n + n^2},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-69922}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Question: for any , is there at least one prime such that ? In this case, that would be stronger than the Schinzel conjecture: "for there's at least one prime such that " since .
The sequence counts the number of prime numbers in the interval :
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«69922».
theorem conjecture (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : 1 ≤ a n
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.