Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-oeis-182510

Recurrence with bitwise XOR

Conjecture: the sequence contains 8 zeros.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-182510,
  title        = {Recurrence with bitwise XOR},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-182510}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

conjecture1. Conjecture: the sequence contains 8 zeros.

conjecture2. Conjecture: more positive terms than negative.

As , the count of positive terms is greater than the count of negative terms.

The requirement that is large enough is needed, since the claim fails for .

The sequence is defined by , , and for , where is the bitwise exclusive-or operator on integers.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«182510» (2 statements).

theorem conjecture1 : Set.ncard {n : ℕ | a n = 0} = 8
theorem conjecture2 :
    ∀ᶠ n in Filter.atTop,
      ((Finset.range n).filter (fun k => a k < 0)).card <
        ((Finset.range n).filter (fun k => 0 < a k)).card

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.