Numerator of ζ(4n)/ζ(2n)^2 (with a(0)=2 instead of -2)
Conjecture: if an integer n > 1 is odd, then ζ(2n)/ζ(n)^2 is irrational. Cf. W. Kohnen (link) and my conjecture in A348829. - Thomas Ordowski, Jan 05 2022
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-114362,
title = {Numerator of ζ(4n)/ζ(2n)^2 (with a(0)=2 instead of -2)},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-114362}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Conjecture: if an integer is odd, then is irrational. Cf. W. Kohnen (link) and my conjecture in A348829. - Thomas Ordowski, Jan 05 2022
The ratio for is the rational number where is the -th Bernoulli number. The sequence is the numerator of , with defined as .
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«114362».
theorem conjecture1 (n : ℕ) (hn_gt_one : 1 < n) (hn_odd : Odd n) :
Irrational ((riemannZeta (2 * n : ℂ) / (riemannZeta (n : ℂ)) ^ 2).re)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.