Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-oeis-105210

Conjectures associated with A105210

Cormier and Selfridge found 5 starting values for which the sequences appear to not merge. The sequences were checked up to 10^8.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-105210,
  title        = {Conjectures associated with A105210},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-105210}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

conjecture_disjoint_starting_values. Cormier and Selfridge found 5 starting values for which the sequences appear to not merge. The sequences were checked up to 10^8.

conjecture. This suggests that there may be infinitely many different (non-merging) sequences obtained by choosing different starting values.

; for , + 1 + sum of distinct prime factors of that are .

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«105210» (2 statements).

theorem conjecture_disjoint_starting_values :
    ∀ j k : ℕ,
      j ∈ ({1, 393, 412, 668, 932} : Set ℕ) →
      k ∈ ({1, 393, 412, 668, 932} : Set ℕ) →
      j ≠ k →
      sequenceSet j ∩ sequenceSet k = ∅
theorem conjecture :
  ∃ K : Set ℕ,
    Set.Infinite K ∧
    (∀ k ∈ K, 1 ≤ k) ∧
    (∀ j k : ℕ,
      j ∈ K → k ∈ K → j ≠ k →
      sequenceSet j ∩ sequenceSet k = ∅)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.