Conjectures associated with A105210
Cormier and Selfridge found 5 starting values for which the sequences appear to not merge. The sequences were checked up to 10^8.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-105210,
title = {Conjectures associated with A105210},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-105210}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
conjecture_disjoint_starting_values. Cormier and Selfridge found 5 starting values for which the sequences appear to not merge. The sequences were checked up to 10^8.
conjecture. This suggests that there may be infinitely many different (non-merging) sequences obtained by choosing different starting values.
; for , + 1 + sum of distinct prime factors of that are .
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«105210» (2 statements).
theorem conjecture_disjoint_starting_values :
∀ j k : ℕ,
j ∈ ({1, 393, 412, 668, 932} : Set ℕ) →
k ∈ ({1, 393, 412, 668, 932} : Set ℕ) →
j ≠ k →
sequenceSet j ∩ sequenceSet k = ∅
theorem conjecture :
∃ K : Set ℕ,
Set.Infinite K ∧
(∀ k ∈ K, 1 ≤ k) ∧
(∀ j k : ℕ,
j ∈ K → k ∈ K → j ≠ k →
sequenceSet j ∩ sequenceSet k = ∅)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.