Prime-th recurrence with reversal at each step
Starting at a positive value other than a(0) = 1, does this sequence ever go into a loop? The positivity hypothesis is required because the source recurrence uses the one-based prime index p₁ = 2; the x = 0 branch above is only an artifact of making aStartAt total on ℕ.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-oeis-100475,
title = {Prime-th recurrence with reversal at each step},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/oeis-100475}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Starting at a positive value other than , does this sequence ever go into a loop?
The positivity hypothesis is required because the source recurrence uses the one-based prime index p₁ = 2; the x = 0 branch above is only an artifact of making aStartAt total on ℕ.
with , where is the -th prime number.
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.OEIS.«100475». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem conjecture :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ x : ℕ, 0 < x ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ IsUltimatelyPeriodic (aStartAt x)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (OEIS), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.