Magic Squares
Does there exist a 3 × 3 matrix such that every entry is a distinct square, and all rows, columns, and diagonals add up to the same value? 0 is excluded, as a Magic Square of Squares with 0 and 8 distinct squares is know is knownn. See Magic Square of Squares
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-magic-squares,
title = {Magic Squares},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/magic-squares}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
exists_magic_square_squares. Does there exist a matrix such that every entry is a distinct square, and all rows, columns, and diagonals add up to the same value?
0 is excluded, as a Magic Square of Squares with 0 and 8 distinct squares is know is knownn. See Magic Square of Squares
exists_semi_magic_square_cubes. Does there exist a semi-magic square whose entries are all distinct positive integer cubes? A square is semi-magic if all rows and columns sum to the same total.
More precisely, we seek a matrix with entries such that each for some positive integer , all nine cubes are distinct, and all row sums and column sums are equal.
Reference: Semi-Magic Square of Cubes
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.MagicSquares (2 statements). answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem exists_magic_square_squares :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ m : Fin 3 → Fin 3 → ℕ, ∃ t : ℕ,
m.Injective2 ∧
(∀ i j, 0 < (m i j) ∧ IsSquare (m i j)) ∧
(∀ i, ∑ j, m i j = t) ∧
(∀ j, ∑ i, m i j = t) ∧
m 0 0 + m 1 1 + m 2 2 = t ∧
m 0 2 + m 1 1 + m 2 0 = t
theorem exists_semi_magic_square_cubes :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ m : Fin 3 → Fin 3 → ℕ, ∃ t : ℕ,
m.Injective2 ∧
(∀ i j, ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ m i j = n ^ 3) ∧
(∀ i, ∑ j, m i j = t) ∧
(∀ j, ∑ i, m i j = t)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
- Magic Square of Squares - Wikipedia
- [multimagie.com](http://www.multimagie.com/English/SquaresOfSquaresSearch.htm)
- Semi-Magic Square of Cubes
- Magic Square of Squares
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Wikipedia), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.