Inscribed square problem
Inscribed square problem Does every Jordan curve admit an inscribed square?
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-inscribed-square,
title = {Inscribed square problem},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/inscribed-square}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
inscribed_square_problem. Inscribed square problem Does every Jordan curve admit an inscribed square?
inscribed_rectangle_problem. Inscribed rectangle problem Does every Jordan curve admit inscribed rectangles of any given aspect ratio?
The inscribed square problem or Toeplitz conjecture asks whether every Jordan curve (i.e. simple close curve in ℝ²) admits an inscribed square, i.e. a square whose vertices all lie on the curve. There are several open and solved variants of this conjecture.
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.InscribedSquare (2 statements). answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem inscribed_square_problem :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ (γ : Circle → ℝ²) (hγ : IsEmbedding γ),
∃ t₁ t₂ t₃ t₄, IsRectangle (γ t₁) (γ t₂) (γ t₃) (γ t₄) 1
theorem inscribed_rectangle_problem :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ (γ : Circle → ℝ²) (hγ : IsEmbedding γ) (r : ℝ) (hr : r > 0),
∃ t₁ t₂ t₃ t₄, IsRectangle (γ t₁) (γ t₂) (γ t₃) (γ t₄) r
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
- Wikipedia
- A Survey on the Square Peg Problem by Benjamin Matschke
- arxiv/2005.09193
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Wikipedia), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.