Ben Green's Open Problem 46
We conjecture that the best-known lower bound can be improved.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-green-46,
title = {Ben Green's Open Problem 46},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/green-46}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
green_46.improve_lower. We conjecture that the best-known lower bound can be improved.
green_46.improve_upper. We conjecture that the best-known upper bound can be improved.
green_46.improve_upper_conjectured. It seems very likely that we must have [Gr24].
What is the largest for which one may cover the interval by residue classes , one for each prime ?
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«46» (3 statements). answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem green_46.improve_lower :
let ans := (answer(sorry) : ℕ → ℝ)
(bestLower =o[atTop] ans) ∧ (ans ≪ maxY)
theorem green_46.improve_upper :
let ans := (answer(sorry) : ℕ → ℝ)
(ans =o[atTop] bestUpper) ∧ (maxY ≪ ans)
theorem green_46.improve_upper_conjectured :
∃ o : ℕ → ℝ, (o =o[atTop] fun _ : ℕ ↦ (1 : ℝ)) ∧
maxY ≪ fun x ↦ (x : ℝ) ^ (1 + o x)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
- [Gr24] Ben Green's Open Problem 46
- [FGK18] Ford, K., Green, B., Konyagin, S., Maynard, J., & Tao, T. (2018). Long gaps between primes. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 31(1), 65-105.
- [Iw78] Iwaniec, Henryk. "On the problem of Jacobsthal." Demonstratio Mathematica 11.1 (1978): 225-232.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Ben Green's 100 open problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.