Ben Green's Open Problem 45
Can we pick residue classes a_p pmodp, one for each prime p ≤ N, such that every integer ≤ N lies in at least 10 of them? Erdős remarks that he does not know how to answer it with 10 replaced by 2; this is Erdos689.erdos_689.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-green-45,
title = {Ben Green's Open Problem 45},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/green-45}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Can we pick residue classes , one for each prime , such that every integer lies in at least of them?
Erdős remarks that he does not know how to answer it with replaced by ; this is Erdos689.erdos_689.
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«45». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem green_45 :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ᶠ N in .atTop, ∃ a : ℕ → ℕ, ∀ m ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N,
10 ≤ (Finset.Icc 1 N |>.filter fun p => p.Prime ∧ a p ≡ m [MOD p]).card
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
The version of this problem with replaced by is Erdos689.erdos_689 in FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«689».
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Ben Green's 100 open problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.