Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-green-44

Green's Open Problem 44

Sieve [N] by removing half the residue classes mod p_i, for primes 2 leqslant p_1 < p_2 < … < p_1000 < N^9/10. Does the remaining set have size at most 1/10 N? We interpret "half the residue classes" as ⌊ p_i / 2 ⌋.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-green-44,
  title        = {Green's Open Problem 44},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/green-44}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Sieve by removing half the residue classes mod , for primes . Does the remaining set have size at most ?

We interpret "half the residue classes" as .

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«44». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem green_44 :
    answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ (N : ℕ) (p : Fin 1000 → ℕ) (A : (i : Fin 1000) → Finset (ZMod (p i))),
      let remaining := (Finset.Icc 1 N).filter (fun x => ∀ i, (x : ZMod (p i)) ∉ A i)
      (∀ i, (p i).Prime) →
      StrictMono p →
      (p 999) ^ 10 < N ^ 9 →
      (∀ i, (A i).card = (p i) / 2) →
      10 * remaining.card ≤ N

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

  • [Gr24] Ben Green's 100 Open Problems
  • [Er80] Erdős, Paul. "A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory." Annals of Discrete Mathematics 6 (1980): 89-115.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Ben Green's 100 open problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.