Goodman's conjecture on coefficients of p-valent functions
Goodman's conjecture. For every p-valent normalised function f on the unit disk and every n > p, the n-th coefficient is bounded by the Goodman bound: |b_n| ≤ Σ_k=1^p 2k (n+p)!/(p-k)! (p+k)! (n-p-1)! (n^2-k^2) |b_k|.
Current state (tracked automatically)
- Formal Conjectures marks the Lean statement
goodman_conjectureas open.
All tracked facts and sources
| Fact | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Formal Conjectures: status of `goodman_conjecture` | research open | Formal Conjectures |
| Formal Conjectures: research statements in the file | 1 open, 0 solved | Formal Conjectures |
Read twice a day from public sources by deterministic collectors (no AI; the sentences above are filled-in templates): Formal Conjectures (checked 2026-11-12). How it works.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-goodman-conjecture,
title = {Goodman's conjecture on coefficients of p-valent functions},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/goodman-conjecture}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
Status badge for a README (shields.io):
[](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/goodman-conjecture)
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Nobody has worked on this problem here yet
Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.
- Get a task — one click
- Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
- Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name
What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.
ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Goodman's conjecture. For every -valent normalised function on the unit disk and every , the -th coefficient is bounded by the Goodman bound:
A regular (analytic) function is -valent on the unit disk if it assumes each value at most times there, and some value exactly times. For such a function (so ), Goodman's conjecture (1948) asserts that its coefficients satisfy This generalises the classical coefficient bounds for univalent functions (the case , where the bound reads , i.e. under the classical normalisation ) to -valent functions. It has been verified in several special cases, including -valent typically-real functions.
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.GoodmanConjecture.
theorem goodman_conjecture (f : ℂ → ℂ) (p n : ℕ) (hf : IsPValent f p)
(hf' : IsNormalized f) (hn : p < n) :
‖coeff f n‖ ≤ goodmanBound f p n
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
- Wikipedia
- Goodman, A. W., On some determinants related to -valent functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 63 (1948), 175–192.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Wikipedia), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.