Gauss circle problem
It is conjectured that the correct bound is |E(r)| = O(r^1/2 + o(1)) [Ha59] Hardy, G. H. (1959). _Ramanujan: Twelve Lectures on Subjects Suggested by His Life and Work_(3rd ed.). New York: Chelsea Publishing Company. p. 67 See also https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03549
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-gauss-circle-problem,
title = {Gauss circle problem},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/gauss-circle-problem}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
It is conjectured that the correct bound is
[Ha59] Hardy, G. H. (1959). _Ramanujan: Twelve Lectures on Subjects Suggested by His Life and Work_(3rd ed.). New York: Chelsea Publishing Company. p. 67
See also https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03549
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.GaussCircleProblem.
theorem error_isBigO : ∃ (o : ℝ → ℝ) (_ : Tendsto o atTop (𝓝 0)),
E =O[atTop] fun r => r ^ (1/2 + o r)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Wikipedia), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.