Erdős Problem #99
For sufficiently large n, is it the case that any set of n points with minimum distance 1 that minimizes diameter must contain an equilateral triangle of side length 1?
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-99,
title = {Erdős Problem #99},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-99}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
For sufficiently large n, is it the case that any set of n points with minimum distance that minimizes diameter must contain an equilateral triangle of side length 1?
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«99». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem erdos_99 :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ᶠ n in Filter.atTop, ∀ A : Finset ℝ²,
A.card = n → HasMinDist1 A →
(IsMinOn (fun B: Finset ℝ² => diam (B : Set ℝ²)) {B : Finset ℝ² | B.card = n ∧ HasMinDist1 B} A) →
∃ᵉ (p ∈ A) (q ∈ A) (r ∈ A), FormsEquilateralTriangle p q r
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/99. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
- erdosproblems.com/99
- [BeFo99] Bezdek, Andr\'{a}s and Fodor, Ferenc, Minimal diameter of certain sets in the plane. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A (1999), 105-111.
- [Er94b] Erd\H{o}s, Paul, Some problems in number theory, combinatorics and combinatorial geometry. Math. Pannon. (1994), 261-269.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.