Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Geometry P-erdos-99

Erdős Problem #99

For sufficiently large n, is it the case that any set of n points with minimum distance 1 that minimizes diameter must contain an equilateral triangle of side length 1?

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-99,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #99},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-99}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

For sufficiently large n, is it the case that any set of n points with minimum distance that minimizes diameter must contain an equilateral triangle of side length 1?

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«99». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_99 :
    answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ᶠ n in Filter.atTop, ∀ A : Finset ℝ²,
      A.card = n → HasMinDist1 A →
      (IsMinOn (fun B: Finset ℝ² => diam (B : Set ℝ²)) {B : Finset ℝ² | B.card = n ∧ HasMinDist1 B} A) →
      ∃ᵉ (p ∈ A) (q ∈ A) (r ∈ A), FormsEquilateralTriangle p q r

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/99. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

  • erdosproblems.com/99
  • [BeFo99] Bezdek, Andr\'{a}s and Fodor, Ferenc, Minimal diameter of certain sets in the plane. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A (1999), 105-111.
  • [Er94b] Erd\H{o}s, Paul, Some problems in number theory, combinatorics and combinatorial geometry. Math. Pannon. (1994), 261-269.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.