Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-erdos-933

Erdős Problem #933

If n(n+1)=2^k3^lm, where (m,6)=1, then is it true that limsup_n→ ∞ 2^k3^l/nlog n=∞?

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-933,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #933},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-933}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

If , where , then is it true that ?

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«933». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_933 :
    answer(sorry) ↔
      atTop.limsup (fun n : ℕ ↦
        ((((2 ^ k n * 3 ^ l n : ℕ) : ℝ) / ((n : ℝ) * Real.log (n : ℝ))) : EReal)) = ⊤

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/933. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

  • erdosproblems.com/933
  • [Er76d] Erdős, P, Problems and results on number theoretic properties of consecutive integers and related questions. Proceedings of the Fifth Manitoba Conference on Numerical Mathematics (Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man., 1975) (1976), 25-44.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.