Erdős Problem #931
Let k_1 ≥ k_2 ≥ 3. Are there only finitely many n_2≥ n_1 + k_1 such that Π_1≤ i≤ k_1(n_1 + i) and Π_1≤ j≤ k_2 (n_2 + j) have the same prime factors?
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-931,
title = {Erdős Problem #931},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-931}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Let . Are there only finitely many such that have the same prime factors?
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«931». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem erdos_931 : answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ᵉ (k₁ : ℕ) (k₂ ≥ 3), k₂ ≤ k₁ →
{ (n₁, n₂) | n₁ + k₁ ≤ n₂ ∧
(∏ i ∈ Finset.Icc 1 k₁, (n₁ + i)).primeFactors =
(∏ j ∈ Finset.Icc 1 k₂, (n₂ + j)).primeFactors }.Finite
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/931. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
Variants
erdos_931.variants.additional_condition— Erdős thought perhaps if the two products have the same factors then n_2 > 2(n_1 + k_1).erdos_931.variants.exists_prime— Erdős was unable to prove that if the two products have the same factors then there must exist a prime between n_1 and n_2.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.