Skip to content
Cairn Commons
X Sign in
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Combinatorics P-erdos-881

Erdős Problem #881

Let A ⊂ ℕ be an additive basis of order k which is minimal in the sense that if B ⊂ A is any infinite set, then A B is not a basis of order k. Must there exist an infinite B ⊂ A such that A B is an additive basis of order k + 1?

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite 
@misc{cairn-erdos-881,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #881},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-881}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Let A ⊂ ℕ be an additive basis of order k which is minimal in the sense that if B ⊂ A is any infinite set, then A \ B is not a basis of order k.

Must there exist an infinite B ⊂ A such that A \ B is an additive basis of order k + 1?

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«881». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_881 :
    answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ (k : ℕ) (A : Set ℕ),
      IsMinimalAsymptoticAddBasisOfOrder k A →
        ∃ (B : Set ℕ), B ⊆ A ∧ B.Infinite ∧
          (A \ B).IsAsymptoticAddBasisOfOrder (k + 1)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/881. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

erdosproblems.com/881

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.