Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Graph theory P-erdos-87

Erdős Problem #87

Let 0 < ε < 1. Is it true that, if k is sufficiently large, then R(G) > (1-ε)^k R(k) for every graph G with chromatic number χ(G)=k? The restriction ε < 1 excludes negative bases in (1-ε)^k. This problem is #12 in Ramsey Theory in the graphs problem collection.

Status (as of 2026-11-11): Open according to erdosproblems.com (status last updated 2025-08-31).

Current state (tracked automatically)

  • erdosproblems.com lists Erdős problem #87 as open (status updated 31 August 2025).
All tracked facts and sources
FactValueSource
Status of Erdős problem #87 on erdosproblems.comopen
2025-08-31
erdosproblems.com
Formal Conjectures: research statements in the file2 open, 0 solvedFormal Conjectures

Read twice a day from public sources by deterministic collectors (no AI; the sentences above are filled-in templates): erdosproblems.com (checked 2026-11-12), Formal Conjectures (checked 2026-11-12). How it works.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Try it with your chatbot Submit a claim Follow (RSS)
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-87,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #87},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-87}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-11-12}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Ferdos-87.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-87)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task on this problem — first, usually, finding what is already published (the quickest useful result); otherwise an approach or a first step. Paste its answer back and publish it. Free plans work; no account is needed to try. Prefer an agent? Connect it over MCP.

  1. Get a task — one click
  2. Your chatbot works on it — 5–10 minutes, in its own tab
  3. Paste its answer here — check it and publish it under your name

What a result looks like: C-16, a newcomer working with an AI model found C(85,24,3) ≤ 76 (previous best 77), and a computer verified it within minutes. A documented dead end counts too.

or , ,

ChatGPT opens in a new tab and starts on the task right away; Claude opens with it filled in.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

erdos_87.parts.i. Let . Is it true that, if is sufficiently large, then for every graph with chromatic number ?

The restriction excludes negative bases in .

This problem is #12 in Ramsey Theory in the graphs problem collection.

erdos_87.parts.ii. Even stronger, is there some such that, for all large , for every graph with chromatic number ?

This problem is #13 in Ramsey Theory in the graphs problem collection.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«87» (2 statements).

theorem erdos_87.parts.i :
    ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ε < 1 → ∀ᶠ k : ℕ in atTop,
      ∀ (V : Type) [Fintype V] (G : SimpleGraph V), G.chromaticNumber = (k : ℕ∞) →
        (SimpleGraph.diagonalGraphRamsey G : ℝ) >
          (1 - ε) ^ k * (SimpleGraph.diagonalRamsey k : ℝ)
theorem erdos_87.parts.ii :
    ∃ c > (0 : ℝ), ∀ᶠ k : ℕ in atTop,
      ∀ (V : Type) [Fintype V] (G : SimpleGraph V), G.chromaticNumber = (k : ℕ∞) →
        (SimpleGraph.diagonalGraphRamsey G : ℝ) > c * (SimpleGraph.diagonalRamsey k : ℝ)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/87. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

  • erdosproblems.com/87
  • [Er95] Erdős, Paul, Some of my favourite problems in number theory, combinatorics, and geometry. Resenhas (1995), 165-186.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit 2f91d251c07f. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.