Erdős Problem #700
Let f(n) = min_1 < k ≤ n/2 gcd(n, C(n, k)) and let P(n) be the largest prime dividing n. (a) Characterise those composite n such that f(n) = n/P(n). Erdős–Szekeres [ErSz78] note that f(n) = n/P(n) when n is a product of two primes (erdos_700.variants.prime_mul), with n = 30 a further example.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-700,
title = {Erdős Problem #700},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-700}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
erdos_700.parts.i. Let and let be the largest prime dividing .
(a) Characterise those composite such that .
Erdős–Szekeres [ErSz78] note that when is a product of two primes (erdos_700.variants.prime_mul), with a further example. The characterisation itself is open; we state it as the (unknown) set of all composite n with f n = n / P n.
erdos_700.parts.ii. Let .
(b) Are there infinitely many composite such that ?
Erdős–Szekeres [ErSz78] could not prove this. (Since , the least prime factor of , there are infinitely many — those of the form — with ; the question asks for the strict inequality.) Here is written as (f n) ^ 2 > n.
erdos_700.parts.iii. Let .
(c) Is it true that, for every composite , for every ?
Erdős–Szekeres [ErSz78] prove the weaker bound (the case ). Here is spelled out as: for every A > 0 there is a constant C (depending on A) with f(n) ≤ C · n/(log n)^A for every composite n.
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«700» (3 statements). answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem erdos_700.parts.i :
{n : ℕ | ¬ n.Prime ∧ 1 < n ∧ f n = n / P n} = answer(sorry)
theorem erdos_700.parts.ii :
answer(sorry) ↔ {n : ℕ | ¬ n.Prime ∧ 1 < n ∧ (f n) ^ 2 > n}.Infinite
theorem erdos_700.parts.iii :
answer(sorry) ↔ (∀ A : ℝ, 0 < A → ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ n : ℕ, ¬ n.Prime → 1 < n →
(f n : ℝ) ≤ C * (n : ℝ) / (Real.log n) ^ A)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/700. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
A problem of Erdős and Szekeres [ErSz78].
References:
- [ErSz78] Erdős, P. and Szekeres, G., _Some number theoretic problems on binomial coefficients_, Austral. Math. Soc. Gaz. (1978), 97-99.
- OEIS A091963
- Guy, R. K., _Unsolved Problems in Number Theory_, B31, B33.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.