Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Combinatorics P-erdos-562

Erdős Problem #562

Let R_r(n) denote the r-uniform hypergraph Ramsey number: the minimal m such that if we 2-colour all edges of the complete r-uniform hypergraph on m vertices then there must be some monochromatic copy of the complete r-uniform hypergraph on n vertices.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-562,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #562},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-562}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Let denote the -uniform hypergraph Ramsey number: the minimal such that if we -colour all edges of the complete -uniform hypergraph on vertices then there must be some monochromatic copy of the complete -uniform hypergraph on vertices.

Prove that, for , where denotes the -fold iterated logarithm.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«562». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_562 : answer(sorry) ↔
    ∀ r ≥ 3, (fun n ↦ log^[r - 1] (hypergraphRamsey r n)) =Θ[atTop] (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ))

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/562. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

erdosproblems.com/562

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.