Erdős Problem #544
Show that R(3,k+1)-R(3,k)→∞ as k→ ∞. A problem of Erdős and Sós. This problem is #8 in Ramsey Theory in the graphs problem collection.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-544,
title = {Erdős Problem #544},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-544}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
erdos_544.parts.i. Show that as .
A problem of Erdős and Sós. This problem is #8 in Ramsey Theory in the graphs problem collection.
erdos_544.parts.ii. Similarly, prove or disprove that
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«544» (2 statements). answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem erdos_544.parts.i :
Tendsto (fun k : ℕ ↦ (SimpleGraph.classicalRamsey 3 (k + 1) : ℝ) -
(SimpleGraph.classicalRamsey 3 k : ℝ)) atTop atTop
theorem erdos_544.parts.ii : answer(sorry) ↔
(fun k : ℕ ↦ (SimpleGraph.classicalRamsey 3 (k + 1) : ℝ) -
(SimpleGraph.classicalRamsey 3 k : ℝ)) =o[atTop] (fun k : ℕ ↦ (k : ℝ))
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/544. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.