Erdős Problem #488
Let A be a finite set and B= n ≥ 1 : a| ntextrm for some a∈ A. Is it true that, for every m>n≥ max(A), lvert B∩ [1,m]rvert /m< 2lvert B∩ [1,n]rvert/n?
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-488,
title = {Erdős Problem #488},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-488}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Let be a finite set and Is it true that, for every ,
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«488». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem erdos_488 : answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ (A : Finset ℕ), A.Nonempty →
-- These are needed for the reasons outlined here: https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/pull/256
0 ∉ A → 1 ∉ A →
letI B := {n ≥ 1 | ∃ a ∈ A, a ∣ n}
∀ᵉ (n : ℕ) (m > n), A.max ≤ n →
((Finset.Icc 1 m).filter (· ∈ B)).card / (m : ℚ) <
2 * ((Finset.Icc 1 n).filter (· ∈ B)).card / n
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/488. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.