Erdős Problem #450
How large must y=y(ε,n) be such that the number of integers in (x,x+y) with a divisor in (n,2n) is at most ε y? The bound is required for every x and every window length at least y, and y(ε,n) is the least such threshold (or ∞ if there is none).
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-450,
title = {Erdős Problem #450},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-450}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
How large must be such that the number of integers in with a divisor in is at most ?
The bound is required for every and every window length at least , and is the least such threshold (or if there is none). A linear scale is known to suffice for fixed and all large (see erdos_450.linear_scale_suffices).
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«450». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem erdos_450 (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) (n : ℕ) : windowThreshold ε n = answer(sorry)
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/450. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.