Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-erdos-354

Erdős Problem #354

Let α,β∈ ℝ_>0 such that α/β is irrational. Is the multiset ⌊ α⌋,⌊ 2α⌋,⌊ 4α⌋,…∪ ⌊ β⌋,⌊ 2β⌋,⌊ 4β⌋,… complete?

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-354,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #354},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-354}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

erdos_354.parts.i. Let such that is irrational. Is the multiset complete?

erdos_354.parts.ii. Let such that is irrational. Is complete?

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«354» (2 statements). answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_354.parts.i : answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ᵉ (α > 0) (β > 0), Irrational (α / β) →
    IsAddCompleteNatSeq' (FloorMultiples.interleave α β 2)
theorem erdos_354.parts.ii : answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ γ ∈ Set.Ioo (1 : ℝ) 2, ∀ᵉ (α > 0) (β > 0), Irrational (α / β) →
    IsAddCompleteNatSeq' (FloorMultiples.interleave α β γ)

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/354. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

erdosproblems.com/354

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.