Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-erdos-25

Erdős Problem #25

Let n_1 < n_2 < … be an arbitrary sequence of integers, each with an associated residue class a_i pmodn_i. Let A be the set of integers n such that for every i either n < n_i or n not≡ a_i pmodn_i. Must the logarithmic density of A exist?

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-25,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #25},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-25}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Let be an arbitrary sequence of integers, each with an associated residue class . Let be the set of integers such that for every either or . Must the logarithmic density of exist?

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«25». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_25 : answer(sorry) ↔
    ∀ (seq_n : ℕ → ℕ) (seq_a : ℕ → ℤ), (∀ i, 0 < seq_n i) → StrictMono seq_n →
      ∃ d, Set.HasLogDensity
        { x : ℕ | ∀ i, (x : ℤ) < seq_n i ∨ ¬((x : ℤ) ≡ seq_a i [ZMOD seq_n i]) } d

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/25. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

erdosproblems.com/25

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.