Erdős Problem #1210
Let A⊆ [1,n) be a set of integers such that (a,b)=1 for all distinct a,b∈ A. Is it true that Σ_a∈ A1/n-a≤ Σ_p < n1/p+O(1)?
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-1210,
title = {Erdős Problem #1210},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-1210}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Let be a set of integers such that for all distinct . Is it true that ?
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«1210». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.
theorem erdos_1210 :
answer(sorry) ↔
∃ C : ℝ, ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ A : Finset ℕ,
(∀ a ∈ A, 1 ≤ a ∧ a < n) →
(∀ a ∈ A, ∀ b ∈ A, a ≠ b → a.Coprime b) →
∑ a ∈ A, (1 / ((n : ℝ) - a)) ≤ (∑ p ∈ (range n).filter Prime, (1 / (p : ℝ))) + C
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/1210. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
Variants
erdos_1210.variants.er80_correction— In [Er80] he claims he "did not state this quite correctly" in [Er77c].
References
- erdosproblems.com/1210
- [Er77c] Erdős, Paul, Problems and results on combinatorial number theory. III. Number theory day (Proc. Conf., Rockefeller Univ., New York, 1976) (1977), 43-72.
- [Er80] Erdős, Paul, A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory. Ann. Discrete Math. (1980), 89-115.
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.