Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Geometry P-erdos-1088

Erdős Problem #1088

Let f_d(n) be the minimal m such that any set of m points in ℝ^d contains a set of n points for which any two determined distances are distinct. Erdős Problem 1088 asks to estimate f_d(n). In particular, is it true that, for every fixed n ≥ 3, f_d(n) = 2^o(d) as d → ∞?

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-erdos-1088,
  title        = {Erdős Problem #1088},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/erdos-1088}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

Let be the minimal such that any set of points in contains a set of points for which any two determined distances are distinct. Erdős Problem 1088 asks to estimate . In particular, is it true that, for every fixed , as ?

The little- condition is stated after taking the base- logarithm.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«1088». answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem erdos_1088 :
    answer(sorry) ↔
      ∀ n ≥ 3,
        (fun d : ℕ ↦ Real.logb 2 (f d n : ℝ)) =o[atTop] (fun d : ℕ ↦ (d : ℝ))

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already — check erdosproblems.com/1088. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

erdosproblems.com/1088

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Erdős problems), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.